Teams

TOC.Spining

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-06vs BENT.WhiteSplit 11
W#2 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Steven Cataldo6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesChip Pope vs Ryan Humrighouse3-6, 0-6
2023-10-30vs TOC.JonnalagaddaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Vijay Rajasekar6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesChip Pope vs Pradeep Hariharan1-6, 4-6
2023-10-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEslam Soliman vs James Lee1-6, 4-6
2023-10-16vs TOC.KharvaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Michael Weslander3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMark Spining vs Brent Hilsabeck6-4, 7-6
2023-10-02vs TOC.ShahWon 10
W#2 SinglesMark Spining vs Vasyl Kapitan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-18vs BENT.WhiteSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Conor Kregecz2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMark Spining vs Truman White6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Vamsee Pasangulapati
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4
3.75
3.69
Mark Spining
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Karan Mehra
published
3.52
Eslam Soliman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Matthew Capobianco
published
3.14
Chip Pope
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Balaji Radhakrishnan + Karan Mehra1539% games−16.8% vs expected
Vamsee Pasangulapati + Mark Spining4553% gamesnot enough data
Eslam Soliman + Mark Spining314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
133W–75L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Balaji Radhakrishnan
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Mark Spining
161W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Karan Mehra
10W–31L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Eslam Soliman
75W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Matthew Capobianco
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Chip Pope
54W–99L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.