Teams

TOC.Jonnalagadda

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-06Split 11
L#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Chintan Gandhi7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRam Basireddy vs Andrew Lee5-4
2023-10-30vs TOC.SpiningWon 21
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Vamsee Pasangulapati1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Karan Mehra6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Chip Pope6-1, 6-4
2023-10-23vs TOC.KharvaWon 20
W#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Brent Hilsabeck4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Tejas Kharva7-5, 6-3
2023-10-16vs TOC.ZhuSplit 11
W#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Yunxiang Zhu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRam Basireddy vs Lei Ji5-7, 0-6
2023-10-09vs TOC.ShahWon 20
W#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Vasyl Kapitan7-5, 7-5
W#3 SinglesRam Basireddy vs UTPAL JADIA6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Blake Watkins6-4, 7-5
2023-09-26vs BENT.WhiteWon 20
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Steven Cataldo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Ryan Humrighouse6-3, 6-1
2023-09-18Split 11
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Andrew Lee6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs James Lee6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Neeraj Singh
published
3.55
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.39
Nitni Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Vijay Rajasekar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Ram Basireddy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pradeep Hariharan + Nitni Agrawal314 matchesnot enough data
Pradeep Hariharan + Ram Basireddy314 matchesnot enough data
Nitni Agrawal + Kiran Ramaswamy213 matchesnot enough data
Kiran Ramaswamy + Vijay Rajasekar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Neeraj Singh
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Nitni Agrawal
210W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Vijay Rajasekar
37W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Ram Basireddy
52W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.