Teams

OC Palisades - Karen Sat1

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-23vs OC Cute on the Court - Mak Sun9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Casares / Lajla Feichter vs Ariel Lee / Emily Wu5-7, 5-7
2023-09-16vs OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sat9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Kelly Casares vs Kari Keese / Stephanie Ellis2-6, 3-6
2023-09-08vs OC Dana Hills TC - DevonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoey Paynter / Jenna van der Meyden vs Amy Berk / Stacy Ison6-1, 6-3
2023-08-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Char / Jenna van der Meyden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-12vs OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sat9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Kelly Ford vs TRAM LY / Kari Keese3-6, 0-6
2023-08-11vs OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sat9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJinna Johnson / Jenna van der Meyden vs Jill Purcell-Rogers / Kristen Hoppe4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKelly Casares / Jenna van der Meyden vs Ripley Uyeda / Jennifer Uyeda2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Lajla Feichter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Jenna van der Meyden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Kelly Ford
published
3.90
Cynthia Neiman
published 4
3.68
Jamie Bland
published 4
3.64
Sunny Park
published
3.52
Jill Muranaka
published
3.36
Karen Brink
published
3.35
Lindsay Miller
published
3.26
Sue Wolfe
published
3.08
Hellene Thurston
published 3.5
Kelly Casares
published
Laura Chasin
published
Leslie Lindahl
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lajla Feichter
74W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Jenna van der Meyden
79W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.25
Kelly Ford
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Cynthia Neiman
28W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Jamie Bland
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Sunny Park
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.52
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.35
Sue Wolfe
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Hellene Thurston
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kelly Casares
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Chasin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Lindahl
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.