Teams

Kings Park, Pomerantz/Kolomick

2023 55&Over Mixed · 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs Lynbrook, HealyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Pomerantz / Joshua Rogowsky vs Angelo de Bourg / Susan Greenberg4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGiacomo Amendolara / Anne Zaret vs Valsey Bartley / Joe Shimer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Brian McGeough vs Stephen Donaldson / Audrey Edwards3-6, 5-7
2023-06-04vs LI: Syosset, Schosberg/BanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Shaw / Robert Shaw vs Carlos Rios / Patricia Siler6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Timothy Consiglio vs Jean Wesh / Jennifer Mao1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Reuben / Brian McGeough vs Anatoly Kagan / Jeanette Romano4-6, 4-5
2023-05-07vs Lynbrook, HealyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBRYON MARTINSEN / Joy Martinsen vs Angelo de Bourg / Susan Greenberg4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Shaw / Sharon Shaw vs Donna Healy / Stephen Donaldson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna LoCascio / Jon Caico vs Darlene Powell Garlington / Michael Fairman6-2, 6-4
2023-04-29vs LI: Syosset, Schosberg/BanksWon 21
L#1 DoublesGiacomo Amendolara / Anne Zaret vs Carlos Rios / Jennifer Mao2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Pomerantz / Joshua Rogowsky vs Gigi Banks / Anatoly Kagan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Timothy Consiglio vs Homero Rios / Marianne Russo7-5, 6-3
2023-03-25vs Lynbrook, HealyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna LoCascio / BRYON MARTINSEN vs Valsey Bartley / Stephen Donaldson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Pomerantz / Joshua Rogowsky vs Angelo de Bourg / Sharon Ollivierre3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Reuben / Brian McGeough vs Michael Fairman / Darlene Powell Garlington2-6, 4-6
2023-03-12vs LI: Syosset, Schosberg/BanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Pomerantz / Joshua Rogowsky vs Carlos Rios / Jennifer Mao3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Reuben / Brian McGeough vs Cesar Oballe / Emily Capobianco2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Jon Caico vs Jeanette Romano / Phil Monticciolo7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lynbrook, Healy0611717148
2LI: Syosset, Schosberg/Banks0611720167
3Kings Park, Pomerantz/Kolomick0651328196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Joshua Rogowsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Donna LoCascio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Sharon Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Sharon Zuch
published 3.5
BRYON MARTINSEN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Anne Zaret
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Pomerantz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Brian McGeough
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Lisa Reuben
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Deborah Kolomick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Alan Zaret
published
Ann Reid
published
Giacomo Amendolara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jon Caico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Martinsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Timothy Consiglio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Shaw + Sharon Shaw201454% games−10.1% vs expected
Joy Martinsen + BRYON MARTINSEN4841% games−21.0% vs expected
Alan Zaret + Anne Zaret5260% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Pomerantz + Joshua Rogowsky134 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kolomick + Timothy Consiglio224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Reuben + Brian McGeough033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joshua Rogowsky
145W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Donna LoCascio
50W–69L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Sharon Shaw
97W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Sharon Zuch
108W–107L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
BRYON MARTINSEN
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Anne Zaret
53W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
Lisa Pomerantz
34W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Brian McGeough
11W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lisa Reuben
28W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Deborah Kolomick
59W–150L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
Alan Zaret
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ann Reid
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Giacomo Amendolara
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Caico
20W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joy Martinsen
18W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Robert Shaw
48W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Consiglio
42W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.