Teams

CVTA/Nicole Williams

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-20vs burkWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Williams / Sarah Wood vs Camille Abney / Constance Fallin1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKay Walraven Attaway vs Elizabeth Brumbelow6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Swendsen / Jennifer Cunningham vs Susan Burk / Emily Mobbs6-3, 6-1
2025-10-13vs burkLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Williams / Amanda Swendsen vs Constance Fallin / Camille Abney4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Clark vs Amy Harrington3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cunningham / Erin Stone vs Joanne Hynson / Amber Hawkins1-6, 4-6
2025-10-06vs burkWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Wood / Jennifer Cunningham vs Constance Fallin / Camille Abney2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKay Walraven Attaway vs Leslie Terrell-Payne6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristie Teasley / Kayla Clark vs Joanne Hynson / Amber Hawkins6-3, 7-6
2025-09-29vs burkWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Williams / Pamela Rutland vs Constance Fallin / Camille Abney7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKay Walraven Attaway vs Amy Harrington6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Wood / Amanda Swendsen vs Susan Burk / Elizabeth Brumbelow6-2, 6-0
2025-09-22vs burkWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cunningham / Kay Walraven Attaway vs Susan Burk / Leslie Terrell-Payne6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristie Teasley / Kayla Clark vs Elizabeth Brumbelow / Emily Mobbs6-2, 6-1
2025-09-15vs burkWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Rutland / Kristie Teasley vs Elizabeth Brumbelow / Joanne Hynson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKay Walraven Attaway vs Lori Patch2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNicole Williams / Sarah Wood vs Susan Burk / Emily Mobbs6-1, 6-1
2025-09-08vs burkWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Wood / Nicole Williams vs Leslie Terrell-Payne / Amy Harrington6-4, 2-1
L#1 SinglesPamela Rutland vs Lori Patch3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cunningham / Erin Stone vs Emily Mobbs / Elizabeth Brumbelow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Sarah Wood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Kristie Teasley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Nicole Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.33
Amanda Swendsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.30
Kayla Clark
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Pamela Rutland
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.26
Kay Walraven Attaway
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.93
Erin Stone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Williams + Amanda Swendsen3849% games−6.1% vs expected
Nicole Williams + Sarah Wood4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Wood
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Kristie Teasley
17W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Nicole Williams
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
3
Amanda Swendsen
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Kayla Clark
7W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Pamela Rutland
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Kay Walraven Attaway
16W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Erin Stone
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.