Teams

burk

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-20vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCamille Abney / Constance Fallin vs Nicole Williams / Sarah Wood6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Brumbelow vs Kay Walraven Attaway2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Burk / Emily Mobbs vs Amanda Swendsen / Jennifer Cunningham3-6, 1-6
2025-10-13vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesConstance Fallin / Camille Abney vs Nicole Williams / Amanda Swendsen6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoanne Hynson / Amber Hawkins vs Jennifer Cunningham / Erin Stone6-1, 6-4
2025-10-06vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesConstance Fallin / Camille Abney vs Sarah Wood / Jennifer Cunningham6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLeslie Terrell-Payne vs Kay Walraven Attaway2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Hynson / Amber Hawkins vs Kristie Teasley / Kayla Clark3-6, 6-7
2025-09-29vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesConstance Fallin / Camille Abney vs Nicole Williams / Pamela Rutland6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Burk / Elizabeth Brumbelow vs Sarah Wood / Amanda Swendsen2-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Burk / Leslie Terrell-Payne vs Jennifer Cunningham / Kay Walraven Attaway2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Brumbelow / Emily Mobbs vs Kristie Teasley / Kayla Clark2-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brumbelow / Joanne Hynson vs Pamela Rutland / Kristie Teasley4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLori Patch vs Kay Walraven Attaway6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Burk / Emily Mobbs vs Nicole Williams / Sarah Wood1-6, 1-6
2025-09-08vs CVTA/Nicole WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Terrell-Payne / Amy Harrington vs Sarah Wood / Nicole Williams4-6, 1-2
W#1 SinglesLori Patch vs Pamela Rutland6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Mobbs / Elizabeth Brumbelow vs Jennifer Cunningham / Erin Stone6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Constance Fallin
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.59
Lori Patch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Emily Mobbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Joanne Hynson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Amber Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Elizabeth Brumbelow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.30
Camille Abney
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
2.21
Susan Burk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.19
Leslie Terrell-Payne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Abney + Constance Fallin121049% games+8.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Brumbelow + Susan Burk1536% games−2.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Brumbelow + Emily Mobbs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Constance Fallin
22W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Lori Patch
44W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
Emily Mobbs
14W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
Joanne Hynson
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
2.5
Amber Hawkins
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.42
Elizabeth Brumbelow
6W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Camille Abney
25W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Susan Burk
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Leslie Terrell-Payne
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.