Teams

Davis/Neal/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-13vs Ossman/Husi/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Neal / Lauren Pollard vs Janet Adamson / Ashley Robin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBetsy Bernstein / Eileen Smith vs Maryam Khan / Jennifer Thomas3-6, 3-6
2026-07-09vs Knight/Bateman/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesNICOLE BATEMAN / Helen Hopson vs Lauren Weaver / Anne Knight6-4, 6-1
2026-07-06vs Lindsay/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Davis / Erin Neal vs Cindy Mccullough / Preeti Arla6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Bernstein / Lauren Pollard vs Patricia Frawley / Tiffini Lindsay7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNikki Turitto / Helen Hopson vs Miranda Brown / Kate Waters6-2, 6-1
2026-06-29vs Gilliam/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Davis / Erin Neal vs Lauren Schmid / Robin Gilliam3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoni Lee / Jill Porter vs Courtney Hendry-Williams / Christy Briggs6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coburn / Sarah Angus vs Catherine Devane / Jessica Osullivan6-2, 6-1
2026-06-25vs LaFevers/Sallis/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesNICOLE BATEMAN / Helen Hopson vs Allison Bassler / Camille Mitchell6-2, 6-3
2026-06-22vs Faulkner/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesBethany Liles / Alexandra Neff vs Heather Skipper / Jennifer Tackett3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarjorie George / Eileen Smith vs Molly Faulkner / Ashley Howard6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coburn / Kelli Haywood vs Caroline Gannon / Jennifer Spoletini6-0, 6-2
2026-06-15vs Steed/Rice/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Lee / Bethany Liles vs Sandra Elliott / Mary Grace Gaines6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJoy Cox / Jill Porter vs Kacey Passmore / Jordan Bohr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Frankel Nau / Kelli Haywood vs Rachel Walker / Victoria Marcella6-4, 6-1
2026-06-08vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Pollard / Lisa Wallace vs Cari Blevins / Stacy Thomas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Bernstein / Marjorie George vs Ellen Gooden / Catherine Pietsch4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHelen Hopson / Nikki Turitto vs Cindy Lee / Alison Ryan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Lisa Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Erin Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Bethany Liles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Alexandra Neff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Lauren Pollard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Joni Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Marjorie George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jill Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Betsy Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelli Haywood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Elizabeth Coburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Nikki Turitto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Helen Hopson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Joy Cox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Amy Frankel Nau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joni Lee + Bethany Liles9071% games+18.5% vs expected
Joy Cox + Lauren Pollard4166% games+11.3% vs expected
Marjorie George + Lauren Pollard6155% games+9.4% vs expected
Betsy Bernstein + Marjorie George4451% games+0.5% vs expected
Alexandra Neff + Lauren Pollard314 matchesnot enough data
Joy Cox + Kelli Haywood213 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Haywood + Elizabeth Coburn303 matchesnot enough data
Nikki Turitto + Helen Hopson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Wallace
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Erin Neal
31W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Bethany Liles
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Alexandra Neff
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Lauren Pollard
32W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Joni Lee
27W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Marjorie George
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jill Porter
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Betsy Bernstein
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Kelli Haywood
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Elizabeth Coburn
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Nikki Turitto
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Helen Hopson
25W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Joy Cox
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Amy Frankel Nau
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.