Teams

Lindsay/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHollie Williams / Suzanne Spalding vs Mollie Alvarez / Cari Blevins4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Waters / Miranda Brown vs Vesna Pavlovic / Ashwini Kashelikar1-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Tiffini Lindsay vs Betsy Bernstein / Lauren Pollard7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiranda Brown / Kate Waters vs Nikki Turitto / Helen Hopson2-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs Delves/NashvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesJulie Scott / Suzanne Spalding vs Jennifer Thomas / Poonam Kabaria2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Hirsekorn / Sara White vs Lisa Freund / Jennifer Jones6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-15vs Anderson/Schmid/NashvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Spalding / Caroline Tapscott vs Ginger Childs / Elizabeth Drew1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJenna Gunnels / Shauna Bowers vs Catherine Devane / Tracy Aszkler1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs McDonald/NashvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Tiffini Lindsay vs Gina Lukes / Katrena Miller6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara White / Kathy Hirsekorn vs Cathy-Jo Elwood / Caroline Gannon6-1, 6-2
2026-06-01vs Steed/Rice/NashvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesCaroline Tapscott / Suzanne Spalding vs Allie Steed / Madeline Long6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJenna Gunnels / Shauna Bowers vs Emma Guidry / Rachel Walker7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Cindy Mccullough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Marybeth Snodgrass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Hollie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Tiffini Lindsay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Preeti Arla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Patricia Frawley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Caroline Tapscott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Kathy Hirsekorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Shauna Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Jenna Gunnels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Waters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miranda Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Frawley + Tiffini Lindsay5060% games+12.3% vs expected
Hollie Williams + Suzanne Spalding4154% games+11.7% vs expected
Suzanne Spalding + Tiffini Lindsay5261% games+2.1% vs expected
Jenna Gunnels + Shauna Bowers3253% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Spalding + Caroline Tapscott314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Mccullough + Preeti Arla123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Marybeth Snodgrass
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Hollie Williams
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Tiffini Lindsay
32W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Preeti Arla
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Patricia Frawley
41W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Caroline Tapscott
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kathy Hirsekorn
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Shauna Bowers
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Jenna Gunnels
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kate Waters
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Miranda Brown
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.