Teams

CHABOT CANYON CW7.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.82
3.76
Kalliope Bellesis
published
3.68
Sara Zhao
published
3.67
Maureen Mcgrath
published
3.64
3.52
Nancy Selph
published
3.48
Penny Anderson
published
3.43
Jennifer Leebove
published
3.40
Alicia Chung
published 3.5
3.40
Debbie Chang
published 3.5
3.35
Janet Daly
published
3.32
Patty Nunez
published
3.21
Jennifer Tetler
published
3.18
Michelle Philpot
published
3.15
Kathleen Maynard
published
2.84
Jennifer Newens
published
2.82
Emiko Motomura
published 3
2.64
Julie Wunderlich
published
Latha Attari
published
Linda M Scaparotti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Wunderlich + Emiko Motomura044 matchesnot enough data
Patty Nunez + Debbie Chang224 matchesnot enough data
Kalliope Bellesis + Maureen Mcgrath213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caitlin Finnell
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.91
4
Alanna Coopersmith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Kalliope Bellesis
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Sara Zhao
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Maureen Mcgrath
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Dorian West Blair
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Nancy Selph
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Penny Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Alicia Chung
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Chang
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Janet Daly
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Patty Nunez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jennifer Tetler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Michelle Philpot
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Kathleen Maynard
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Newens
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Emiko Motomura
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Julie Wunderlich
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.64
Latha Attari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda M Scaparotti
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.