Teams

Stonebrook/WCC

2021 SVTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-09vs MiddleburgWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Watts / Kim Leas vs Jayne Deckwitz / Ashley la Shelle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-02vs Surfin' the NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Lori Miller vs Patricia Shepard / Laramie Richbourg3-6, 4-6
2021-05-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Lori Miller vs Linda Pongsugree / Monica Kelly2-6, 4-6
2021-05-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Kim Leas vs Leyla Lytle / Allison Broadbent6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-05vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine McHale / Kim Leas vs Sharon Clinton / Jayne Deckwitz2-6, 5-7
2021-04-28vs Surfin' the NetLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Deborah Grove vs Wendy Hopkins / Lee O'Connor6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Wright / Kim Leas vs Maria Sanders / Kelly Stanley4-6, 5-7
2021-04-21vs Live.Love.LocoLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Rebecca Watts vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Jill Poretz2-6, 4-6
2021-04-07vs Making a RacquetLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Lee / Kim Leas vs Erin Kaplan / Holly McMullen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Niki Gerhard
published
3.68
Deborah Grove
published 4
3.55
Susan Weber
published
3.54
Gera Mort
published 4
3.52
Stacey Stickley
published
3.44
Kim Leas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Carisa Dueweke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Katherine McHale
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Leas + Carisa Dueweke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Niki Gerhard
29W–39L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Deborah Grove
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Susan Weber
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Gera Mort
18W–24L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
Stacey Stickley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kim Leas
143W–143L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
4
Carisa Dueweke
74W–148L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.25
Katherine McHale
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.