Teams

UTC - Rubio

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 7.0 X

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs Barbara Robinson / Michael Robinson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs LEECHAR/Ramsey/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs Trip Vanroden / Christine Kehrli3-6, 1-6
2025-01-25vs Babcock National - JichaWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sareh / Guido Leiendecker vs Karen Nuthals / Dan Nuthals6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhillip Trammel / Cathy O'Neill vs Linda Revis / Mario Barajas6-0, 6-0
2025-01-19vs UTC - CampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Nancy Joseph vs Dan Campbell / Sherri Campbell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-18vs Vivante - MadeanLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs Darwin Hormann / Karen Corliss6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Patricia Sareh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
3.48
Kenrick Gallander
published
3.45
Cathy O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Beryl Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.40
Phillip Trammel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Guido Leiendecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Gaines
published 3.5
2.91
Carmelo Rubio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
John Sofia
published
John Spallone
published
Michal Nawalany
published
Pauline Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phillip Trammel + Beryl Gonzalez4156% gamesnot enough data
Carmelo Rubio + Patricia Sareh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Sareh
26W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Christina Candelario
90W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Kenrick Gallander
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Cathy O'Neill
52W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Beryl Gonzalez
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
Phillip Trammel
32W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Guido Leiendecker
2W–4L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Gaines
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
John Sofia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Spallone
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michal Nawalany
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pauline Smith
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.