Teams

EM RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs COURTNEY PASQUE6-1, 7-5
2024-05-22vs HG GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMandi Williams / Robin Farris vs Gabby Roose / Kristina Paul6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs Jane Doe0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-15vs SS-D PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandi Williams / Robin Farris vs Brigit McNair / Angela Jones6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs Tracy Schwartz6-0, 6-1
2024-05-08vs HFII REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMandi Williams / Emily Yates vs Theresa Aye / Kelly Peecher6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs Katie Vail6-1, 6-0
2024-05-01vs HV BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Yates / Mandi Williams vs Stacie Moncrief / Aaren Wiesler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs Susan Davis6-2, 6-0
2024-04-17vs HW PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Farris / Mandi Williams vs Jill Ellsworth / McKay Pittman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hand vs Bridgette Ward6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Lindsay Hand
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Robin Farris
published
2.63
Mandi Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.59
Lauren Knight
published
2.53
Katie Schaefer
published
2.46
Anne Kay
published 2.5
2.31
Natalie Dean
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Hand + Katie Schaefer404 matchesnot enough data
Anne Kay + Mandi Williams404 matchesnot enough data
Robin Farris + Katie Schaefer033 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Knight + Mandi Williams303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Kay + Natalie Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lindsay Hand
45W–35L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
Robin Farris
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Mandi Williams
46W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%18%82%
2.63
Lauren Knight
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
Katie Schaefer
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Anne Kay
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%62%38%
2.46
Natalie Dean
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.