Teams

SS-H GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Shea / Georgeann Doyna vs Emily Yates / Robin Farris2-6, 5-7
2024-05-22vs HV BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesMarsha Visscher vs Aaren Wiesler2-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs HF REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Shea / Marsha Visscher vs Carrie Moss / Emily Bischoff6-2, 6-4
2024-05-08vs HW PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarsha Visscher / Monica Linnell vs Bridgette Ward / Debora Rewerts4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-01vs HFII REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaria Shea vs Laura Fraser6-3, 6-0
2024-04-24vs HG GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarsha Visscher / COURTNEY PASQUE vs Tasha Maty / Tammi Farrelly6-2, 6-0
2024-04-17vs SS-D PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Pomeroy / Maria Shea vs Angela Jones / Stephanie Block6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
COURTNEY PASQUE
published 3
2.68
Maria Shea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.33
Marsha Visscher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Georgeann Doyna
published
2.06
Adrienne Grady
published 2.5
2.02
Meghan Pomeroy
published
Kathleen Maddock
published
Monica Linnell
published
Tricia Lowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Shea + Marsha Visscher7558% games+5.2% vs expected
Adrienne Grady + Meghan Pomeroy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
COURTNEY PASQUE
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Maria Shea
40W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Marsha Visscher
42W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Georgeann Doyna
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Adrienne Grady
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Meghan Pomeroy
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kathleen Maddock
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Linnell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Lowe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.