Teams

SFV - Dominators

2023 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Deepak Antony vs Billy Kim / Stephen Nettelhorst6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-12vs SFV - AV StormersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / David Berkowitz vs Brad Bixel / Kevin Maldonado2-6, 4-6
2023-11-04vs SFV - Braemar BangersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMel Johnson / Edmond Avedisian vs Keith Lebowitz / Darren Chu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-28vs SFV - Toluca LakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Edmond Avedisian vs Bret Hofstein / Cortes Alexander0-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs SFV - The 300'sLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Jose Mendoza vs Shimon Nofar / Gary Weinzimer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-08vs SFV - GFT Club (M4)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Berkowitz / Edmond Avedisian vs Jisoo Han / Michael Porter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Mel Johnson vs ALEX CHUNG / Dastan Mazhetayev6-7, 1-6
2023-09-23vs SFV - Paseo United D4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Edmond Avedisian vs Harris Hall / Kyle Reyes3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
3.61
Edmond Avedisian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.42
Jose MacKinney
published
3.31
Lee Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Mel Johnson
published
3.19
Mark Gasper
published
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
RUBEN SIMON
published
Sehyung Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garen Amirganian + Lee Tsai191652% games−4.4% vs expected
Edmond Avedisian + Garen Amirganian134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Gasper + Deepak Antony033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abhijeet Golwelkar
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–117L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jose MacKinney
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
RUBEN SIMON
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sehyung Kim
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.