Teams

SFV - The 300's

2023 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesShimon Nofar / David Soucy vs Edward Rozman / Giancarlo Bertumen1-6, 3-6
2023-11-11vs SFV - Braemar BangersWon 20
W#1 DoublesShimon Nofar / Gary Weinzimer vs Michael Cox / Keith Small7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMacLyn McRae / Brad Lomax vs David Hittelman / David McFarland6-3, 6-2
2023-10-29vs SFV - GFT Club (M4)Won 10
W#2 DoublesShimon Nofar / Gary Weinzimer vs Michael Porter / Jisoo Han6-3, 7-5
2023-10-22vs SFV - DominatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShimon Nofar / Gary Weinzimer vs Edmond Avedisian / Jose Mendoza6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs SFV - Paseo United D4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesBrad Lomax / MacLyn McRae vs Alain Banas / James Ordway2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGary Weinzimer / Shimon Nofar vs Philip Smith / James Miller6-3, 6-3
2023-10-01vs SFV - Toluca LakersWon 20
W#2 DoublesEric Schaefer / MacLyn McRae vs Rajeev Ronanki / Travis Schuldt7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGary Weinzimer / Shimon Nofar vs Benjamin Hayes / Jeff Bushell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Shimon Nofar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Eric Schaefer
published 4
3.85
MacLyn McRae
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Brad Lomax
published 4
Chris Gennusa
published 4
David Soucy
published 4
Gary Weinzimer
published 4
3.73
Erik Houser
published 4
3.63
Peter Heinbecker
published
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Peter Schuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Lomax + Eric Schaefer4163% games+14.1% vs expected
Shimon Nofar + MacLyn McRae224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
MacLyn McRae
94W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Brad Lomax
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Chris Gennusa
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Soucy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Gary Weinzimer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Erik Houser
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Schuster
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.