Teams

SFV LLW - Northridge Quakes - Alan Esguerra

2023 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-17vs SFV - The 300'sWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Rozman / Giancarlo Bertumen vs Shimon Nofar / David Soucy6-1, 6-3
2023-12-09vs SFV - DominatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBilly Kim / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Edmond Avedisian / Deepak Antony4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-19vs SFV - Toluca LakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Hudson / Jose Guerrero vs James Fregia / Robert Haleman6-1, 6-4
2023-10-29vs SFV - Paseo United D4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Nettelhorst / Jose Guerrero vs James Ordway / Alain Banas6-4, 6-3
2023-10-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesPhillip Nguyen / Giancarlo Bertumen vs David Hittelman / Duryea Ruffins6-2, 6-2
2023-09-23vs SFV - GFT Club (M4)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBilly Kim / Jose Guerrero vs Clement Chan / Won Cho7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alan Esguerra
published 4.5
4.22
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
4.21
Sebastien Damas
published
4.16
Giancarlo Bertumen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Shane Duffy
published
4.03
Nick Litvinov
published
4.03
Stephen Nettelhorst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.99
Renaldo Goncalves
published
3.98
Michael Tan
published
3.89
Jose Guerrero
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Kangsung Yip
published 4
3.85
Edward Rozman
published 4
3.68
Steve Oetomo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Guerrero + Giancarlo Bertumen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alan Esguerra
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Sebastien Damas
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Giancarlo Bertumen
129W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
Shane Duffy
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Nick Litvinov
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Stephen Nettelhorst
157W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
Renaldo Goncalves
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Michael Tan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
Jose Guerrero
106W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Kangsung Yip
132W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Edward Rozman
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.