Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2024-03-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Lowe / Audrey Schroeder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLana Rak / Julie Lowe vs Elaine Marshall / Mickie Kerr4-6, 6-2
2024-03-16vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW3.0BLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Niel / Julie Lowe vs Rochelle Dineen / Stacie Jessee3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-10vs WASHINGTON PK 40AW3.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Isis S vs Serena Zanello / Lana Rak5-7, 1-6
2024-02-24vs BAY TREES PK 40AW3.0BWon 10
W#2 DoublesMai Pham / Julie Lowe vs Gunnel Nyberg / JoAnn Mar6-2, 6-1
2024-02-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Lowe / Mai Pham vs Stella Liu / Jennifer Owens4-6, 2-6
2024-02-13vs CLAREMONT CC 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Simpson / Julie Lowe vs Lindsay Thomasson / Mary Hentges3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-02-11vs DIABLO CC 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Lowe / Audrey Schroeder vs Kate Doerksen / Katy Drucker6-2, 6-4
2024-02-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesLarissa Edwards / Michelle Watkins vs Diana Millado / Sandra Chiao6-4, 6-2
2024-02-10vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Lim / Julie Lowe vs Priscilla Z Behidj / Grace DeForest6-2, 6-4
2024-02-10vs WASHINGTON PK 40AW3.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Karen Davis vs Lynne Harrington / Anna DeRoos2-6, 0-6
2024-01-28vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Debenedetti / Julie Lowe vs Janicke Polumbo / Carolyn Whittle6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-01-28vs HARBOR BAY 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Gunnel Nyberg vs Sharon Garvine / Tracy Jensen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-27vs CROW CANYON CC 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Lowe / Trisha Shah vs Cami Bebarta / GLORYA SMITH6-3, 6-2
2024-01-25vs ROUND HILL CC 40AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesAudrey Schroeder / Julie Lowe vs Michelle Stratmore / Carla Forgham6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Julie Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Karin Hein
published
2.97
Kasey Chung
published
2.90
Maria Debenedetti
published
2.84
Nancy Boswell
published
2.83
Cynthia Lim
published 3
2.79
Connie Stutz
published 3
Michelle Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Diane Simpson
published 3
2.68
Manuela Robinson
published
2.61
Charlotte Niel
published 3
2.61
LyLy Kim
published
2.59
Leann Kanowsky
published
2.59
Laila Grassley
published
2.46
Olivia Mattox
published
Gunnel Nyberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manuela Robinson + Leann Kanowsky134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Lowe
118W–102L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Karin Hein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kasey Chung
34W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Maria Debenedetti
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Nancy Boswell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Cynthia Lim
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Connie Stutz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Michelle Watkins
50W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Diane Simpson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Manuela Robinson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%10%90%
2.68
3
Charlotte Niel
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
LyLy Kim
24W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%22%78%
2.61
Leann Kanowsky
16W–31L career · no lines in 2024
0%26%74%
2.59
Laila Grassley
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%27%73%
2.59
Olivia Mattox
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%61%39%
2.46
Gunnel Nyberg
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.