Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
KIM HOLLAND
published
3.00
Jessica Soltz Rudd
published
2.98
Andrea Akel
published 3
2.98
Tine Ankersen
published
2.97
Patty Ly
published
2.95
Olga Keselman
published
2.83
Maryam Amini
published
2.80
Lana Rak
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
2.77
Anita Lifson
published 3
Anne Graham
published 3
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
JEANNE MEDJEU
published
Suzanne Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KIM HOLLAND + Tine Ankersen4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Jessica Soltz Rudd
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Andrea Akel
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tine Ankersen
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Olga Keselman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Lana Rak
57W–46L career · 18 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Anita Lifson
6W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Anne Graham
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
JEANNE MEDJEU
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Garrett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.