Teams

DTC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-23vs CHCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesEthel McGlynn vs Kelly Koch6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKayla Hodges / Kristin Bokelman vs Ann Marie Johnson / Vanessa Ramich4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-06vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesEthel McGlynn vs Suzi Janzen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-27vs CACM PINKWon 10
W#1 SinglesEthel McGlynn vs Teri Smith6-2, 6-2
2023-06-15vs EM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Donahue / Ethel McGlynn vs Jean Steimel / Corey Craig2-6, 2-6
2023-06-08vs CACM BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Emily Pruisner / Tamra Nathan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Kayla Hodges
published
3.37
Ethel McGlynn
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Kimberly Montgomery
published
3.31
Liz Donahue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Kristin Bokelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Julie Snyder
published
3.26
Sarah Killeen
published
Cristin Bracken
published 3.5
3.18
Sarah Hart
published
3.11
Laura Rogers
published
2.98
Caitlin Keys
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Bokelman + Kimberly Montgomery9359% games+5.5% vs expected
Sarah Hart + Kimberly Montgomery3651% games−2.3% vs expected
Liz Donahue + Ethel McGlynn221955% games−3.3% vs expected
Laura Rogers + Kimberly Montgomery1447% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bokelman + Sarah Hart314 matchesnot enough data
Liz Donahue + Julie Snyder213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hart + Laura Rogers123 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Montgomery + Julie Snyder303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Hodges
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Ethel McGlynn
45W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kimberly Montgomery
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Liz Donahue
45W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kristin Bokelman
87W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Julie Snyder
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Killeen
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Cristin Bracken
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Hart
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Laura Rogers
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Caitlin Keys
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.