Teams

EM RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs GTC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesJean Steimel / Colley Moe vs Rebecca Gart / Ashley Banister-Riley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKate Bangs vs Carrie Lee0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberley Silverman / Ashley Wolfe vs Sue Hickey / Nicole Parker1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Rohs / Kathryn Terry vs Kimberly Allen / Suzette Emerson4-6, 6-7
2023-07-13vs SKY BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Zink / Corey Craig vs Suzi Janzen / Heather Bacon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColley Moe / Ashley Wolfe vs Laura Agelopoulos / Cristi Malloy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrilynn Cahill / Kathryn Terry vs Katherine Sullivan / Sandra Schumm6-4, 6-1
2023-07-06vs APR-U REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrilynn Cahill / Melissa Zink vs Lynn LaTorre / Julie Thornton2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJean Steimel vs Muffy Steinhoff6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesColley Moe / Michele Olree vs Carolyn Jeffrey / Stacey Gilmore4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathryn Terry / Ashley Wolfe vs Cathy Shahan / Barbara Vander Wall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-29vs CACM PINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesCorey Craig / Colley Moe vs Melissa Heine / Sarah Jensik6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichele Olree / Ashley Wolfe vs Pallavi Marulasiddappa / Michelle Curtiss2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrilynn Cahill / Jean Steimel vs Heather Mitchell / Bobbie Turner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-22vs CACM BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Colley Moe vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCorey Craig vs Tamra Nathan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Zink / Ashley Wolfe vs Kelly Fitz / BethAnn Parsons3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberley Silverman / Kathryn Terry vs Monique Wehrle / Charlotte Gillespie1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-15vs DTC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberley Silverman / Ashley Wolfe vs Kayla Hodges / Laura Rogers1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKate Bangs vs Sarah Killeen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJean Steimel / Corey Craig vs Liz Donahue / Ethel McGlynn6-2, 6-2
2023-06-08vs CHCC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMelissa Zink / Colley Moe vs Dananne Solomon / Elizabeth Morton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJean Steimel vs Holly Strandes7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Ruth Rohs vs Meredith Calkins / Julia Brown6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Terry / Kimberley Silverman vs Callie Nowicki / Kelly Koch2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Melissa Zink
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Jean Steimel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Corey Craig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.47
Colley Moe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Ashley Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.12
Michele Olree
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Brilynn Cahill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathryn Terry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Bangs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kimberley Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ruth Rohs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Steimel + Brilynn Cahill7171% games+13.0% vs expected
Colley Moe + Ruth Rohs2357% games+5.5% vs expected
Michele Olree + Kimberley Silverman3349% games+3.9% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Colley Moe12562% games+3.4% vs expected
Colley Moe + Michele Olree121253% games+1.5% vs expected
Kathryn Terry + Brilynn Cahill5750% games+0.3% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Corey Craig3255% games−0.1% vs expected
Colley Moe + Ashley Wolfe10949% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Zink
107W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jean Steimel
144W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Corey Craig
26W–19L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Colley Moe
63W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ashley Wolfe
49W–55L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Michele Olree
89W–143L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brilynn Cahill
56W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kathryn Terry
46W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Kate Bangs
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberley Silverman
34W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Rohs
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.