Teams

BP YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-09-03vs RHCC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesKateri Salk-Gundersen / Margarite Parker vs Katie Hurst / Shannen Major4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharlie Brunt vs Jaclyn Tracy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHannah DeMilta / Ashley Koransky vs Heidi Wendling / Kirstin McConnell1-6, 0-6
2026-08-27vs NJ BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Richmond / Kateri Salk-Gundersen vs Shaun Howe / Natasha Uecker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaylen Krause vs Rachel Eng6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Binau / Margarite Parker vs Pamela Johnstone / Jennifer Grube3-6, 4-6
2026-08-20vs LTC-M GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Richmond / Margarite Parker vs Molly Beach / Ursula Hamel6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharlie Brunt / Hannah DeMilta vs Molly Balmes / Amy Coddington5-7, 2-6
2026-08-19vs NJ YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaylen Krause / Ashley Koransky vs Nohemi Almaraz / Mollie Toth3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Binau vs Sarah Weill6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHannah DeMilta / Charlie Brunt vs Julie Steven / Jennifer Livingston6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs MC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargarite Parker / Melissa Richmond vs Mai Lee / Natalie Sanso6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKateri Salk-Gundersen vs Kristin Mazzarese2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Binau / Hannah DeMilta vs Bobbi Dorgan / Karen Boisnard6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-30vs RHCC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Richmond / Margarite Parker vs Kirstin McConnell / Valerie VanAlsburg6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHannah DeMilta vs Shannen Major0-6, 0-6
2026-07-23vs NJ BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesKateri Salk-Gundersen / Ashley Koransky vs Kerry Mobley / Carrie Poulsen1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAshley Binau vs Rachel Eng7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaylen Krause / Charlie Brunt vs Natasha Uecker / Marlene Swartz6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP PINK3072670
2CP WHITE3072670
3HRCA-N WHITE3184983
4HFII BLACK2163873
5BTA-IBM PURPLE21541067
6VCC NAVY21541188
7HG PINK21541185
8BP YELLOW12451184
9PTC BLUE12361285
10PRC ORANGE12271489
11PRC PINK124514101
12HFII GOLD12361497
13LTA-P RED134817108
14KNO YELLOW03271490
15HRCA-N PURPLE032715102
16GCC PURPLE03271599
17GAC ORANGE03271597

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Margarite Parker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.45
Melissa Richmond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kaylen Krause
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Ashley Binau
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Charlie Brunt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Kateri Salk-Gundersen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Ashley Koransky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Hannah DeMilta
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Richmond + Margarite Parker12167% games+10.6% vs expected
Kateri Salk-Gundersen + Melissa Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margarite Parker
52W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Melissa Richmond
36W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Kaylen Krause
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Ashley Binau
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Charlie Brunt
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kateri Salk-Gundersen
42W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ashley Koransky
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Hannah DeMilta
1W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.