Teams

NJ YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-27vs RHCC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesCayti Stein / Xiaoyan Wang vs Kathryn Kurtz / Heidi Wendling4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Clymer / Brooke Rinehart vs Kirstin McConnell / Jaclyn Tracy1-6, 4-6
2026-08-20vs NJ BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesCayti Stein / Michaela Redlingshafer vs Shaun Howe / Natasha Uecker7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesXiaoyan Wang vs Jennifer Grube6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Weill / Nohemi Almaraz vs Carrie Poulsen / Pamela Johnstone6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs BP YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesNohemi Almaraz / Mollie Toth vs Kaylen Krause / Ashley Koransky6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Weill vs Ashley Binau2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Steven / Jennifer Livingston vs Hannah DeMilta / Charlie Brunt3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-06vs LTC-M GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Weill / Nohemi Almaraz vs Ursula Hamel / Molly Balmes6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesXiaoyan Wang vs Dana Stehno6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNora Tucker / Jennifer Livingston vs Julie Gall / Lauren Cilli2-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs MC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMollie Toth / Katie Clymer vs Karen Boisnard / Gemma Koehler5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesXiaoyan Wang vs Kristin Mazzarese6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNora Tucker / Brooke Rinehart vs Mai Lee / Natalie Sanso3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-23vs RHCC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Weill / Nohemi Almaraz vs Kirstin McConnell / Kathryn Kurtz6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesXiaoyan Wang vs Katie Weiman1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCayti Stein / Michaela Redlingshafer vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Brenda Christy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Nohemi Almaraz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Michaela Redlingshafer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Xiaoyan Wang
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Mollie Toth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.17
Julie Steven
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Katie Clymer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Cayti Stein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Brooke Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Sarah Weill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Nora Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Weill + Julie Steven5254% games+6.7% vs expected
Sarah Weill + Nohemi Almaraz314 matchesnot enough data
Nohemi Almaraz + Mollie Toth314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Clymer + Brooke Rinehart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nohemi Almaraz
71W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
Michaela Redlingshafer
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Xiaoyan Wang
44W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Mollie Toth
149W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
Julie Steven
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Katie Clymer
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cayti Stein
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brooke Rinehart
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Sarah Weill
140W–91L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Nora Tucker
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.