Teams

CP GOLD

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-08vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesMichael McAuliffe / Stephen Rozman vs John Fruit / Brendon Bravo2-6, 3-6
2026-07-01vs MC GREENLost 01
L#2 Male SinglesAlan Caffey vs Paul Gruszecki2-6, 3-6
2026-06-17vs MC YELLOWLost 01
L#1 Male SinglesStephen Rozman vs Bryan Racz7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-10vs BTA-C GOLDLost 01
L#2 Male SinglesAlan Caffey vs Alexander Muhr4-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesAlan Caffey / Stephen Rozman vs Bradley Schwoegler / Jeremy Hand2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ RED6115613141
2MC YELLOW6115617155
3BTA-C GOLD34101123191
4CP GOLD34101126204
5LTC-M NAVY2581328210
6MC GREEN1651633220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dylan Drendel
published
3.84
Bradley Congdon
published 4
3.78
Michael Whitman
published
3.72
Michael McAuliffe
published
3.71
Robert Shepard
published
3.70
Ethan Ader
published
3.70
William Lindsay
published
3.69
Stephen Rozman
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Adam Gunther
published 4
3.63
Tally Lawing
published 3.5
3.56
Alan Caffey
usually #2 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dylan Drendel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Bradley Congdon
5W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Michael Whitman
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
Michael McAuliffe
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Robert Shepard
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Ethan Ader
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
William Lindsay
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Stephen Rozman
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Adam Gunther
18W–5L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Tally Lawing
63W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Alan Caffey
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.