Teams

MC YELLOW

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs LTC-M NAVYSplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesRohit Bhattacharya / Brett Gedvilas vs Lukas Gnirke / Dylan Griffin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 Male SinglesBryan Racz vs Kevin Klepacki3-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs BTA-C GOLDWon 10
W#1 Male SinglesPawel Mankowski vs Alexander Muhr6-2, 6-3
2026-07-01vs NJ REDSplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesPawel Mankowski / Lorne Fultonberg vs Thomas Cauchi / Jeremy Hand6-0, 6-4
L#2 Male SinglesBryan Racz vs Bradley Schwoegler3-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs MC GREENWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesBryan Racz / Lorne Fultonberg vs Paul Gruszecki / Jules Perryman6-3, 6-0
W#1 Male SinglesPawel Mankowski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-17vs CP GOLDSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Lorne Fultonberg vs Ethan Ader / William Lindsay6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 Male SinglesBryan Racz vs Stephen Rozman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-16vs LTC-M NAVYWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesPawel Mankowski / Brett Gedvilas vs Matt Worrell / Tyler McFarland7-6, 6-3
W#1 Male SinglesBryan Racz vs George Burton6-2, 6-1
2026-06-03vs BTA-C GOLDLost 12
L#1 Male DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Martijn Letteboer vs Peter Britton / Jack Lange3-6, 3-6
L#1 Male SinglesBryan Racz vs Alexander Muhr6-7, 2-6
W#2 Male SinglesPawel Mankowski vs Victor Casler6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ RED6115613141
2MC YELLOW6115617155
3BTA-C GOLD34101123191
4CP GOLD34101126204
5LTC-M NAVY2581328210
6MC GREEN1651633220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Pawel Mankowski
usually #1 Male Doubles 40%, also #1 Male Singles 40% · published 4
3.84
Bryan Racz
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 17% · published 4
3.74
Jacob Hargreaves
published 4
3.74
Brett Gedvilas
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
Lorne Fultonberg
published
Martijn Letteboer
published
Rohit Bhattacharya
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pawel Mankowski
51W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
4.17
4
Bryan Racz
34W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Jacob Hargreaves
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Brett Gedvilas
27W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Lorne Fultonberg
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Martijn Letteboer
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rohit Bhattacharya
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.