Teams

CM RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesDoug Wulf / Mark Melberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-08vs CACM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaird Blue / David Tighe vs Jeffrey Raval / John Anadiotis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-01vs SKY GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Melberg / William Dickey vs Brian Dwyer / Tony Ryan0-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs WP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Melberg / David Tighe vs Tally Lawing / Jordan Olson4-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs DTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Melberg / Adam Poe vs Christopher Jackson / Neil Nowak1-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs GPTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Melberg / David Tighe vs Anuj Deshmukh / Carlos Hinrichsen4-6, 2-6
2025-06-03vs WP-G GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMark Melberg / Adam Poe vs Mario Crobu / Cam Weprin2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Hicham Zhiri2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaird Blue / William Dickey vs Mihir Mehta / Konstantin Gradushy6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoug Wulf / Lee Johnson vs Seamus Doyle / John Davis0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Mark Melberg
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Clint Cook
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
William Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Jim Roper
published
3.09
Adam Poe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Laird Blue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lee Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Matthew Parsons
published
2.97
David Tighe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Doug Wulf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laird Blue + William Dickey4742% games−0.1% vs expected
Lee Johnson + Matthew Parsons3937% games−7.4% vs expected
Adam Poe + David Tighe0630% games−7.6% vs expected
David Tighe + Mark Melberg3347% gamesnot enough data
Laird Blue + Jim Roper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mark Melberg
112W–80L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Clint Cook
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
William Dickey
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jim Roper
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Adam Poe
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Laird Blue
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lee Johnson
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Matthew Parsons
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
David Tighe
35W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Doug Wulf
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.