Teams

The Plantation - Balsimo

2022 Duval Trilevel Women · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Cynthia Haines vs Marte Bell / Angie Peaslee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-21vs JCA - BiggersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Cynthia Haines vs Elizabeth Seeker / Krista Murray6-0, 6-4
2022-07-14vs Eagle Harbor - JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Brianne Toole vs Nancy Wentz / Tameka Bezue-Jackson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-30vs Hidden Hills - CateWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Cynthia Haines vs Michelle Jahn / Olivia Markham6-4, 6-3
2022-06-23vs Marsh Landing - PeverleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Cynthia Haines vs Courtney Kessler / Taylore Stokes6-2, 6-1
2022-06-16vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Jane Freedman vs Cindy Bleiel / Ruth Jones-Looney6-4, 7-5
2022-06-09vs Sawgrass - WrightWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Brianne Toole vs Francine Serur / Julie Barney6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Cynthia Haines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brianne Toole
published 3.5
3.58
Amy Balsimo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Mindy Ezring
published
2.78
Colleen Licata
published 3
2.73
Sheila Pensotti
published
Jane Freedman
published
Kathleen Sullivan
published
Louise Jack
published
Lynn Buchanan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brianne Toole + Cynthia Haines4165% games+4.9% vs expected
Cynthia Haines + Amy Balsimo404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Haines
127W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
3.5
Brianne Toole
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
4
Amy Balsimo
28W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mindy Ezring
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Colleen Licata
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Sheila Pensotti
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Jane Freedman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Sullivan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise Jack
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Buchanan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.