Teams

JCA - Biggers

2022 Duval Trilevel Women · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Kelly Cusick vs Angie Peaslee / Alison Garcia2-6, 4-6
2022-07-21vs The Plantation - BalsimoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Krista Murray vs Amy Balsimo / Cynthia Haines0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKim Alexander / Kelly Cusick vs Louise Jack / Brianne Toole6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-14vs Oakbridge - Binaco-OssiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrista Murray / Kelly Cusick vs Donna Erenberg / Kristen Craig6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Susan Sceifers vs Robin Leventhal / Carmel Buchanan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Krista Murray vs Allison Korman Shelton / Karla Liguori6-1, 6-3
2022-06-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Cusick / Kim Alexander vs Carrie Newell / Sherri Ouchi1-6, 0-6
2022-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesKrista Murray / Kelly Cusick vs Joyce Tabor / Deneen Barrett6-4, 6-2
2022-06-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Kelly Cusick vs Rosemary Cate / Heather Bailey6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Krista Murray
published
3.57
Kelly Cusick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Elizabeth Seeker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Debra Sussman
published 3.5
3.18
Carrie Frank
published 3.5
3.02
Staci Hill
published
2.96
2.87
Kim Alexander
published
2.67
Angela Atkins
published 3
Sally Flynn
published
Susan Sceifers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cusick + Elizabeth Seeker251359% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Murray
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kelly Cusick
107W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Elizabeth Seeker
82W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Debra Sussman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carrie Frank
8W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Staci Hill
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Christina Biggers
18W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kim Alexander
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Angela Atkins
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Sally Flynn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Sceifers
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.