Teams

MTS:King

2026 NH Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Men 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-09vs ALG:McCallumLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlden Smith / Thomas Bennett vs Prasad Tadi / Robert Bondaruk6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJason Stadler / Robert Zeller vs Jeffrey Hastings / Christopher McCallum3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesScott Goodwin / Peter Ericson vs Dana Lavoie / Michael Delaney3-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs ALG:McCallumLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlden Smith / Radu Stan vs Dana Lavoie / Bryan Playford6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniel Scharpf / Jason Stadler vs Kiran Humagai / Michael Delaney2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Ericson / Scott Goodwin vs Eric Morrow / Edward Normand1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-28vs ALG:McCallumWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Kennedy / Thomas Bennett vs Prasad Tadi / David Page7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJason Stadler / Robert Zeller vs Michael Delaney / Jeffrey Hastings3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlden Smith / Radu Stan vs Eric Morrow / Edward Normand6-3, 6-2
2026-03-01vs ALG:McCallumLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Bennett / Jim Kennedy vs Dana Lavoie / Bryan Playford6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Pontious / Daniel Scharpf vs Eduardo Ibanez / Kiran Humagai1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRadu Stan / Scott Goodwin vs David Page / Eric Morrow6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-14vs ALG:McCallumWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Goodwin / Radu Stan vs David Page / Mike Carri7-5, 7-5
2026-01-18vs ALG:McCallumWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Goodwin / Jason Stadler vs Mike Carri / Eduardo Ibanez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Bennett / Jim Kennedy vs Ephraim Lin / Christopher McCallum4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRadu Stan / Richard King vs Dana Lavoie / Rick Leclerc4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ALG:McCallum069920151
2MTS:King069922178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Alden Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Thomas Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Radu Stan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Robert Zeller
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.36
Scott Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Jason Stadler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Daniel Scharpf
usually #2 Doubles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
Jim Kennedy
published
Peter Ericson
published
Richard King
published
Scott Robinson
published
William Pontious
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Goodwin + Radu Stan134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Goodwin + Richard King134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alden Smith
32W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Thomas Bennett
102W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Radu Stan
158W–77L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
Robert Zeller
14W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Scott Goodwin
15W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36
Jason Stadler
40W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Daniel Scharpf
30W–46L career · 10 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Jim Kennedy
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Ericson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard King
28W–52L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Robinson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Pontious
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.