Teams

Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.5

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-06vs Q Team 18 Adult M4.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAustin Stege / John McNally vs Brian Joelson / Brent McCall6-0, 6-1
2026-07-06vs Q Team 18 Adult M4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesShawn Farnell / Jesse Chavez vs Brent McCall / Daniel Plowman6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSam Bell vs Zachary Bekkedahl6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn McNally / Austin Stege vs Charles Oneill / Brian Joelson6-1, 6-1
2026-07-04vs Q Team 18 Adult M4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesSam Bell vs Ian Hay-Arthur6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJesse Chavez / John McNally vs Greg Stampfli / Brian Joelson6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.530132556
2Q Team 18 Adult M4.50321326175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Sam Bell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.44
Ian Powers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.42
Wil Hotz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Shawn Farnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Colby Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Reeves Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Jesse Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Austin Stege
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Bryce Melcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
John McNally
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Stege + John McNally5172% games+11.9% vs expected
Reeves Anderson + Ian Powers12459% games+5.9% vs expected
Reeves Anderson + Shawn Farnell3251% games−6.3% vs expected
Austin Stege + Bryce Melcher3845% games−7.1% vs expected
Jesse Chavez + Shawn Farnell224 matchesnot enough data
Wil Hotz + Ian Powers224 matchesnot enough data
Colby Mueller + Ian Powers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Bell
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
4.59
4.5
Ian Powers
59W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Wil Hotz
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Shawn Farnell
58W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Colby Mueller
62W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Reeves Anderson
91W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Jesse Chavez
26W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Austin Stege
38W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Bryce Melcher
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.12
John McNally
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.