Teams

Q Team 18 Adult M4.5

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.35 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-06vs Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Plowman / Charles Oneill vs Daniel Jackson / Colby Mueller2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIan Hay-Arthur vs Wil Hotz2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Joelson / Brent McCall vs Austin Stege / John McNally0-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent McCall / Daniel Plowman vs Shawn Farnell / Jesse Chavez2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Oneill / Brian Joelson vs John McNally / Austin Stege1-6, 1-6
2026-07-04vs Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesIan Hay-Arthur vs Sam Bell4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Fox / Andrew Meister vs Bryce Melcher / Shawn Farnell7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGreg Stampfli / Brian Joelson vs Jesse Chavez / John McNally0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Stege/18AdultM4.530132556
2Q Team 18 Adult M4.50321326175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Andrew Meister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Leon Patchett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Christopher Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Ian Hay-Arthur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.26
Scott Schaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Zachary Bekkedahl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Christian Muna
published 4.5
3.99
Brent McCall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.79
Daniel Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Charles Oneill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.34
Brian Joelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Greg Stampfli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Plowman + Greg Stampfli314 matchesnot enough data
Leon Patchett + Scott Schaffer213 matchesnot enough data
Scott Schaffer + Christopher Fox213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Meister
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.38
4.5
Leon Patchett
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Christopher Fox
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
4.31
Ian Hay-Arthur
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Scott Schaffer
97W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Zachary Bekkedahl
58W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Christian Muna
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Brent McCall
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Daniel Plowman
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Charles Oneill
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Brian Joelson
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
Greg Stampfli
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.