Teams

KHart (Blakeney)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-10vs JAlexander/WParker (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Christina Peterson vs Lin Su / Xersalyn Threet7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Tara Tyson vs Alison Lacy Sherrill / Jennifer Sopel0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKari McGregor / Lisa Craig vs Michelle Fontana / Rachael Schuler1-6, 1-6
2023-05-09vs AAdams (OPRC)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLaurie Canata / Christina Peterson vs Amy Adams / Barbara Salvucci4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Kelly Floyd7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Michelle Wright vs Heather Shaw / Virginia Jenkins0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKari McGregor / Smita Thakur vs Jennifer Gardiner / Kathryn Karakus0-6, 6-7
2023-04-19vs DThayaprasat (Lifetime)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Christina Peterson vs Krista Reardon / Karen Rocchio1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSmita Thakur vs Kandi Jackson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna DePollo / Susan McDonald vs Dora Burdzinska-Drezek / Anna Kamenova0-6, 4-6
2023-04-12vs SReynolds (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKaty Hart / Lisa Craig vs Liz Barton / Nicole Yudin0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLee Page / Kari McGregor vs Caroline Pickup / Megan Griffin2-6, 5-7
2023-04-05vs JAlexander/WParker (Queens)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Michelle Wright vs Xersalyn Threet / Lisa Wilkins6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTara Tyson / Kari McGregor vs Wendy Parker / Dorothy Cato2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Peterson / Katy Hart vs Pamela Beecher / Rachael Schuler0-6, 3-6
2023-03-15vs AAdams (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Peterson / Donna DePollo vs Rosemary Hill / Virginia Jenkins6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLee Page / Katy Hart vs Nan Miller / Heather Shaw6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Craig / Kari McGregor vs Lisa Kane / Kathryn Karakus1-6, 3-6
2023-03-08vs DThayaprasat (Lifetime)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Canata / Lee Page vs Becky Tennyson / Darri Thayaprasat0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKari McGregor / Michelle Wright vs Cynthia Frasier / Anna Kamenova1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaty Hart / Smita Thakur vs Cindi Helms / Anna McLaughlin6-4, 7-5
2023-03-01vs SReynolds (Queens)Split 22
L#1 DoublesSmita Thakur / Michelle Wright vs Elizabeth McCombs / Monica Sferro1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDonna DePollo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Lee Page vs Paula Lauher / Caroline Pickup2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKari McGregor / Lisa Craig vs Nicole Morris / Mindy Merchant6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Meghan Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
3.96
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
3.81
Donna DePollo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Smita Thakur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Mary Shea
published
3.71
Lee Page
published
3.62
India Branker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Katy Hart
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.56
Laurie Canata
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.55
Lisa Craig
published
3.43
Tara Tyson
published
3.43
Susan McDonald
published
3.37
Kari McGregor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

India Branker + Smita Thakur5840% games+1.3% vs expected
Smita Thakur + Katy Hart8650% games−0.9% vs expected
Tara Tyson + Katy Hart4448% games−4.8% vs expected
Kari McGregor + Katy Hart11135% gamesnot enough data
Kari McGregor + India Branker4645% gamesnot enough data
Donna DePollo + Laurie Canata4455% gamesnot enough data
Kari McGregor + Laurie Canata123 matchesnot enough data
India Branker + Katy Hart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Christina Peterson
65W–35L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Donna DePollo
106W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Smita Thakur
78W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Mary Shea
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Lee Page
39W–23L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
India Branker
47W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Katy Hart
65W–128L career · 10 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Laurie Canata
80W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Lisa Craig
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
Tara Tyson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Susan McDonald
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Kari McGregor
53W–96L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.