Teams

DTC #2

2022 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-31vs DTC #1Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmy Bernstein / Joan Chinn vs Diana Stiglic / Janelle Wright6-1, 6-3
2022-08-24vs RED ROCK CC #1Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesJodie Mandel / Joan Chinn vs Heather Gamez / Lisa Hunt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-17vs STIRLING CLUBWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesAmy Bernstein / Geraldine Davis vs Debra Kelleher / Stephanie Stephen6-1, 6-3
2022-08-10vs DRAGONRIDGE CCWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesGeraldine Davis / Joan Chinn vs Robi Hinton / Keaton della Rocca6-4, 7-6
2022-08-03vs TPCWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmy Bernstein / Joan Chinn vs Eva Liang / Katrina Braman6-4, 6-4
2022-07-27vs SPANISH OAKSWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesGeraldine Davis vs Hollie Millican1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-13vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesJodie Mandel / Joan Chinn vs Jeanette van Emon / Roxanne Villalba2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-06vs RED ROCK CC #2Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesGeraldine Davis / Jodie Mandel vs Golssa Moridi / Maryam Kaveh6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Geraldine Davis
usually #2 Female Doubles 30%, also #1 Female Singles 30% · published 3
2.51
Amy Bernstein
published 2.5
2.37
Michelle Mortensen
published
2.20
Joan Chinn
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 42% · published 2.5
Dianna Russo
published
Jodie Mandel
published
Kimberly Cunningham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Davis + Amy Bernstein10850% games−3.9% vs expected
Joan Chinn + Geraldine Davis5945% games−4.4% vs expected
Joan Chinn + Amy Bernstein2833% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Geraldine Davis
113W–115L career · 10 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Amy Bernstein
58W–70L career · no lines in 2022
0%46%54%
2.51
Michelle Mortensen
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Joan Chinn
65W–89L career · 12 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
Dianna Russo
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodie Mandel
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Cunningham
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.