Teams

WHITNEY MESA PARK

2022 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 2.5 WOMEN

4 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-31Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesGeneva Marcus / LOURDES MENDOZA vs Catherine Perez / Heather Jones5-7, 4-6
2022-08-25vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 12
L#1 Female DoublesLOURDES MENDOZA / Shirley Thompson vs Maryam Kaveh / Golssa Moridi3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesRoxanne Villalba vs Jeannie Sorenson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesEileen Pico / Geneva Marcus vs Courtney Long / Tina Nathalia0-6, 0-6
2022-08-24vs STIRLING CLUBLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesLOURDES MENDOZA vs Emily Lindsey3-6, 4-6
L#2 Female DoublesGeneva Marcus / Eileen Pico vs Lori Smith / Stephanie Stephen5-7, 6-7
2022-08-10vs DTC #1Lost 03
L#1 Female DoublesRoxanne Villalba / Nathalie Nang vs Gina Alcoser / Janelle Wright1-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesLOURDES MENDOZA vs Anna Hardeman3-6, 5-7
L#2 Female DoublesGeneva Marcus / Jeanette van Emon vs Dana Davenport / Vanessa Gaines1-6, 3-6
2022-08-06vs TPCLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesGeneva Marcus / LOURDES MENDOZA vs Trish Metriyakool / Eva Liang3-6, 2-6
L#2 Female DoublesRoxanne Villalba / Jeanette van Emon vs Dulcinea Rongavilla / Katrina Braman0-6, 0-6
2022-08-03vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesGeneva Marcus / Roxanne Villalba vs Robi Hinton / Raedene Counts1-6, 2-6
2022-07-24vs SPANISH OAKSLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesLOURDES MENDOZA / Geneva Marcus vs Alexandria Chang / Nancy Ozun4-6, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesNathalie Nang / Roxanne Villalba vs Jenny Mulopulos / Tracey Lee0-6, 1-6
2022-07-13vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 Female DoublesEileen Pico / Geneva Marcus vs Dianna Russo / Kimberly Cunningham3-6, 4-6
W#1 Female SinglesLOURDES MENDOZA vs Michelle Mortensen6-1, 6-1
L#2 Female DoublesJeanette van Emon / Roxanne Villalba vs Jodie Mandel / Joan Chinn6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
LOURDES MENDOZA
usually #1 Female Doubles 44%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
Roxanne Villalba
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
1.66
Geneva Marcus
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Shirley Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geneva Marcus + LOURDES MENDOZA033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
LOURDES MENDOZA
187W–113L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
3
Roxanne Villalba
70W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Geneva Marcus
7W–63L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.66
Shirley Thompson
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.