Teams

KY/LEX/Fak/Begley

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 55 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-10vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesJana Brooking / Lynn Littrell vs Yvonne Conner / Olive Gallagher6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Mullins / Mary Diggins vs Karen Sandberg / Lola Baker7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Ferlan / Betty Grey vs Rhonda Hilton / Diana Simpson6-2, 6-4
2025-12-06vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Amy Cunningham vs Sarah Hancock / Vivian Esteve7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynn Littrell / Jana Brooking vs Olive Gallagher / Regina Covington7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Mary Ferlan vs Diana Simpson / Lola Baker6-1, 7-5
2025-12-01vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetty Grey / Lynn Littrell vs Emily Diehl / Sarah Hancock1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Ferlan / Archna Johnson vs Rhonda Hilton / Lola Baker7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-19vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Lynn Littrell vs Olive Gallagher / Emily Diehl7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Sally Baker vs Yvonne Conner / Lola Baker4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ferlan / Leslie Nuckols vs Diana Simpson / Regina Covington6-3, 6-4
2025-11-10vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesJana Brooking / Lynn Littrell vs Sarah Hancock / Rhonda Hilton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Cunningham / Sally Baker vs Olive Gallagher / Elizabeth Doss7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Ferlan / Betty Grey vs Karen Sandberg / Diana Simpson6-1, 6-2
2025-11-03vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Cunningham / Monica Mullins vs Monica Mestanza / Vivian Esteve6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynn Littrell / Jana Brooking vs Lola Baker / Rhonda Hilton5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Fakharpour / Leslie Nuckols vs Elizabeth Doss / Karen Sandberg0-6, 1-6
2025-10-26vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Littrell / Amy Cunningham vs Olive Gallagher / Emily Diehl4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ferlan / Catherine Sauvage vs Monica Mestanza / Yvonne Conner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBetty Grey / Leslie Nuckols vs Diana Simpson / Regina Covington2-6, 1-6
2025-10-14vs KY/LEX/Simpson-GallagherLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Baker / Mary Diggins vs Emily Diehl / Sarah Hancock3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Betty Grey vs Karen Sandberg / Yvonne Conner6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesArchna Johnson / Mary Ferlan vs Regina Covington / Elizabeth Doss2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Jana Brooking
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Lynn Littrell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Monica Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Luchsinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Catherine Sauvage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Mary Diggins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Mary Ferlan
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Betty Grey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Sally Baker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Leslie Nuckols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Archna Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Mary Fakharpour
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Begley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Littrell + Jana Brooking6552% games−3.8% vs expected
Mary Ferlan + Archna Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ferlan + Betty Grey404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fakharpour + Betty Grey044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Diggins + Nina Begley033 matchesnot enough data
Monica Mullins + Nina Begley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jana Brooking
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lynn Littrell
12W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Monica Mullins
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Sauvage
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Diggins
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Ferlan
10W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Betty Grey
12W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sally Baker
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Leslie Nuckols
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
3
Archna Johnson
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Mary Fakharpour
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nina Begley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.