Teams

KY/LEX/Simpson-Gallagher

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 55 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-10vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesYvonne Conner / Olive Gallagher vs Jana Brooking / Lynn Littrell4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Sandberg / Lola Baker vs Monica Mullins / Mary Diggins5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Diana Simpson vs Mary Ferlan / Betty Grey2-6, 4-6
2025-12-06vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hancock / Vivian Esteve vs Mary Diggins / Amy Cunningham5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Regina Covington vs Lynn Littrell / Jana Brooking5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Simpson / Lola Baker vs Amy Luchsinger / Mary Ferlan1-6, 5-7
2025-12-01vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleySplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Sarah Hancock vs Betty Grey / Lynn Littrell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Lola Baker vs Mary Ferlan / Archna Johnson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-19vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Emily Diehl vs Mary Diggins / Lynn Littrell5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYvonne Conner / Lola Baker vs Amy Luchsinger / Sally Baker6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiana Simpson / Regina Covington vs Mary Ferlan / Leslie Nuckols3-6, 4-6
2025-11-10vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hancock / Rhonda Hilton vs Jana Brooking / Lynn Littrell2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Elizabeth Doss vs Amy Cunningham / Sally Baker5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Sandberg / Diana Simpson vs Mary Ferlan / Betty Grey1-6, 2-6
2025-11-03vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Vivian Esteve vs Amy Cunningham / Monica Mullins3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLola Baker / Rhonda Hilton vs Lynn Littrell / Jana Brooking7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Doss / Karen Sandberg vs Mary Fakharpour / Leslie Nuckols6-0, 6-1
2025-10-26vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Emily Diehl vs Lynn Littrell / Amy Cunningham6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Yvonne Conner vs Mary Ferlan / Catherine Sauvage6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Simpson / Regina Covington vs Betty Grey / Leslie Nuckols6-2, 6-1
2025-10-14vs KY/LEX/Fak/BegleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Sarah Hancock vs Sally Baker / Mary Diggins6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Sandberg / Yvonne Conner vs Amy Luchsinger / Betty Grey1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Covington / Elizabeth Doss vs Archna Johnson / Mary Ferlan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Simpson-Gallagher53111331227
2KY/LEX/Fak/Begley35131124211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Emily Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Doss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Olive Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Lola Baker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Yvonne Conner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Karen Sandberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Regina Covington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Monica Mestanza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Rhonda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Diana Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Vivian Esteve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Simpson + Regina Covington1638% games+6.9% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza1638% games−2.5% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Olive Gallagher5060% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Regina Covington224 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Olive Gallagher044 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Karen Sandberg134 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Hilton + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Diehl
99W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Elizabeth Doss
16W–18L career · type D · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olive Gallagher
20W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Lola Baker
10W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Yvonne Conner
25W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Karen Sandberg
10W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Regina Covington
18W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Monica Mestanza
12W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
Rhonda Hilton
59W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Diana Simpson
6W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Vivian Esteve
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.