Teams

BRMST PINK

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.35 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs BTA GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Bouck / Cheryl Williams vs Teri Jean Fry / Ruta Cariov5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Knickerbocker / Carol Anderson vs Linda Schutter / Jackye Whalen6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Martin / Susan Cave vs Mary Fitzgibbon / Alexis Culver5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-27vs RMTC PINKLost 12
L#2 DoublesVickie Garn / Cheryl Williams vs Terry Crook / Jennifer Wells1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKathy Depinto vs Andrea Barsch6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCynthia Manley / Carol Anderson vs Lisa Maggio / Tamara Bodner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-20vs CVTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Anderson / Cynthia Manley vs Heather Riley / Sarah Streett6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Knickerbocker / Vickie Garn vs Kerry Hanneman / Terry Tessier3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCheryl Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-13vs NJ VIOLETSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSandy Sutton / Vickie Garn vs Lauren Rivas / Gina Stroup7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Anderson / Cynthia Manley vs Kira Moore / Holly Bristol6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCheryl Williams vs Abigail Rancour2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKimberley Paulsen / Kathy Depinto vs Renee Richker / Jeska Jurasic6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-06vs TTA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Bouck / Kathy Depinto vs Catherine Jankowski / Jackie Kimmel7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLynn Knickerbocker vs Natasha Kovacs-Hegedus1-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Williams / Susan Cave vs Tara Tovar / Linda Hendrix6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-29vs NJ GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesCynthia Manley / Carol Anderson vs Natalie Cervera / Kathy Peterson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKimberley Paulsen / Kathy Depinto vs Cynthia Snavely / Helen Hock6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesVickie Garn vs Angela Harper1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Burchell / Lynn Knickerbocker vs Elizabeth Shields / Christy Carello6-2, 7-5
2021-04-22vs LTA PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Bouck / Lynn Knickerbocker vs Julie Obrien / Jenna Osborne6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Depinto / Kimberley Paulsen vs Jodie Morgan / Melissa Karch3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVickie Garn / Cheryl Williams vs Natalie Gilbert / Julie Whitney6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Stacey Mari
published 4
3.33
Cheryl Williams
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Carol Anderson
published 3.5
3.16
Lynn Knickerbocker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Depinto
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Ann Ipsen
published 3.5
2.77
Michele Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Vickie Garn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Manley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Susan Cave
published
2.63
Cynthia Burchell
published 3
Jill Bouck
published
Kimberley Paulsen
published
Sandy Sutton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Anderson + Lynn Knickerbocker7461% games+11.1% vs expected
Sandy Sutton + Cheryl Williams8157% games+8.0% vs expected
Vickie Garn + Kathy Depinto4952% games+5.1% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Ann Ipsen3355% games+4.3% vs expected
Lynn Knickerbocker + Cynthia Burchell4448% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Cave + Michele Martin141951% games+1.5% vs expected
Ann Ipsen + Kathy Depinto131349% games+0.4% vs expected
Lynn Knickerbocker + Jill Bouck6751% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacey Mari
134W–51L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
3.5
Cheryl Williams
145W–113L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Carol Anderson
64W–64L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Lynn Knickerbocker
113W–96L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kathy Depinto
51W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ann Ipsen
32W–53L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Michele Martin
46W–63L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Vickie Garn
98W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cynthia Manley
64W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Susan Cave
56W–101L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cynthia Burchell
23W–34L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jill Bouck
46W–63L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberley Paulsen
13W–39L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Sutton
52W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.