Teams

CVTA BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs TTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesKerry Hanneman / Terry Tessier vs Sarah Vincent / Rossi Javernick6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Donahue / Michaela Masciarelli vs Jackie Kimmel / Tara Tovar2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-27vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Tessier / Kerry Hanneman vs Kathy Peterson / Heidi Warriner2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Riley / Sarah Streett vs Mary Bare / Cynthia Snavely4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Meghan Donahue vs Angela Harper / Helen Hock2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-20vs BRMST PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Riley / Sarah Streett vs Carol Anderson / Cynthia Manley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKerry Hanneman / Terry Tessier vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Vickie Garn6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-13vs BTA GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Riley / Sarah Streett vs Linda Schutter / Mary Fitzgibbon6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Kerry Hanneman vs Rebekah Harvey / Teri Jean Fry6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMeghan Donahue / Michaela Masciarelli vs Tara Peltier / Emily Pieper1-6, 3-6
2021-05-06vs RMTC PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Riley / Sarah Streett vs Kathy Blockwick / Pat Noyes0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Michaela Masciarelli vs Lisa Maggio / Tamara Bodner2-6, 2-6
2021-04-30vs LTA PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Riley / Sarah Streett vs Camille Benton / Julie Obrien7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Michelle Beard vs Jodie Morgan / Paige Sopcic3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Natalie Gilbert / Julie Whitney4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-22vs NJ VIOLETSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Streett / Heather Riley vs Jill Mendoza / Marla Gordon4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Beard / Michaela Masciarelli vs Jeska Jurasic / Renee Richker6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings59 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA GREY703149214
2SSH GREY7031411210
3BTA ORANGE7029618267
4SSLT NAVY7026921256
5NJ BLACK6128718248
6MC RED6127821233
7SSLGT NAVY6126922225
8APR GREEN6126922261
9BM ORANGE6127824283
10CACM GREY61251025257
11NJ GREY61231232323
12GTC BLACK61211435321
13PRKR GOLD5123716208
14SSLT GREEN5123718200
15HRCA RED52221332290
16TTA RED52211435318
17KC GREEN52201536305
18BP ORANGE52181737298
19CM MAROON52191638308
20CR RED42181228273
21CACI RED42181230257
22RCC RED43171839320
23HW BLUE43191639322
24KC ORANGE43191639321
25GTC NAVY43191639338
26KC NAVY43171840326
27GLDN RED43161940300
28LTC GREEN43181742348
29HFII GREEN34191634276
30SKY SILVER34191635306
31GTC BLUE34181738319
32SSG BLUE34191638324
33SSH GREEN34122346348
34HRCA BLUE34142148341
35RRTC NAVY24121841305
36LTA RED25152041343
37KC GREY25161942313
38GAC GREY25152045335
39RHCC BLUE25161946352
40WC NAVY25142147363
41STAP BLUE25142147364
42KC BLUE25142148342
43HRCA BLACK25132249370
44EM RED25112452368
45BRMST MAROON25112453377
46CVTA BLUE25112454371
47LEBTC BLACK25102554367
48SSLT YELLOW25102558385
49SH BLUE1562448321
50MC GOLD16142146353
51BCC RED16112449351
52SKY MAROON16122349353
53KC SILVER16112451352
54WP ORANGE16112452365
55CVTA GREEN1692654362
56APR YELLOW1682759388
57CPV GREEN0652553334
58LTC RED0782757380
59NJ YELLOW0772858396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Sarah Streett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.78
Kerry Hanneman
published
Elizabeth Steed
published 3
2.71
Michaela Masciarelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Terry Tessier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Keri Konold
published
Meghan Donahue
published
Michelle Beard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Hanneman + Michaela Masciarelli111450% games+0.0% vs expected
Terry Tessier + Michaela Masciarelli2841% games−3.1% vs expected
Kerry Hanneman + Terry Tessier1444% games−5.1% vs expected
Michelle Beard + Michaela Masciarelli0534% games−12.7% vs expected
Michelle Beard + Keri Konold3252% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Donahue + Michaela Masciarelli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Streett
119W–98L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Kerry Hanneman
27W–32L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Elizabeth Steed
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Michaela Masciarelli
31W–61L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Terry Tessier
76W–108L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Keri Konold
19W–33L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Meghan Donahue
21W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Beard
19W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.