Teams

HFII GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs SSLT REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanice Bull / Pam Babb vs Andrea Bailey / Ellen Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJeana Marks vs Carin Buster6-1, 6-1
2021-05-27vs HW TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Babb / Janice Bull vs Corby McGrath / Jennifer Marlowe1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Gotto vs Jennifer Johnson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Thompson / Jeana Marks vs Leslie Cutter / Christy Serenyi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Hugh / Mary Thompson vs Ann Mann / Terri Secor6-2, 6-0
2021-05-13vs RRTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Elizabeth Gotto vs Crystal Higgins / Marla Roper3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Bull / Ann Hugh vs Ellen Ribes-Smith / Heather Kelly6-4, 6-4
2021-05-06vs PRC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanice Bull / Pam Babb vs Ellen Irwin / Marcie Manuello0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShirlee Lindgren / Ann Hugh vs Christie Dyer / Amanda Caldwell1-6, 3-6
2021-04-29vs CACI YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Hugh / Shirlee Lindgren vs Margaret Ewald / Diane Wells2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJeana Marks vs Karen Ruwe6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gotto / Michelle Johnson vs Donna Coates / Soon Hee Kolrud6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-22vs SSH GREENSplit 11
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Gotto vs Sam Erickson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeana Marks / Shirlee Lindgren vs Laura Fry / Halle Holmes4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings59 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA GREY703149214
2SSH GREY7031411210
3BTA ORANGE7029618267
4SSLT NAVY7026921256
5NJ BLACK6128718248
6MC RED6127821233
7SSLGT NAVY6126922225
8APR GREEN6126922261
9BM ORANGE6127824283
10CACM GREY61251025257
11NJ GREY61231232323
12GTC BLACK61211435321
13PRKR GOLD5123716208
14SSLT GREEN5123718200
15HRCA RED52221332290
16TTA RED52211435318
17KC GREEN52201536305
18BP ORANGE52181737298
19CM MAROON52191638308
20CR RED42181228273
21CACI RED42181230257
22RCC RED43171839320
23HW BLUE43191639322
24KC ORANGE43191639321
25GTC NAVY43191639338
26KC NAVY43171840326
27GLDN RED43161940300
28LTC GREEN43181742348
29HFII GREEN34191634276
30SKY SILVER34191635306
31GTC BLUE34181738319
32SSG BLUE34191638324
33SSH GREEN34122346348
34HRCA BLUE34142148341
35RRTC NAVY24121841305
36LTA RED25152041343
37KC GREY25161942313
38GAC GREY25152045335
39RHCC BLUE25161946352
40WC NAVY25142147363
41STAP BLUE25142147364
42KC BLUE25142148342
43HRCA BLACK25132249370
44EM RED25112452368
45BRMST MAROON25112453377
46CVTA BLUE25112454371
47LEBTC BLACK25102554367
48SSLT YELLOW25102558385
49SH BLUE1562448321
50MC GOLD16142146353
51BCC RED16112449351
52SKY MAROON16122349353
53KC SILVER16112451352
54WP ORANGE16112452365
55CVTA GREEN1692654362
56APR YELLOW1682759388
57CPV GREEN0652553334
58LTC RED0782757380
59NJ YELLOW0772858396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Andrea Karp
published 3.5
3.19
Janice Bull
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Jeana Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Ann Hugh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Watson
published
3.04
Mary Thompson
published
3.03
Sally Panis
published
2.91
Melissa Owens
published
2.84
2.74
Elizabeth Gotto
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Pam Babb
published
Shirlee Lindgren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen Garrison + Ann Hugh3447% games+3.0% vs expected
Gretchen Garrison + Melissa Owens2743% games+0.8% vs expected
Jeana Marks + Ann Hugh141448% games+0.8% vs expected
Jeana Marks + Mary Thompson91847% games+0.5% vs expected
Gretchen Garrison + Lisa Watson81341% games−1.8% vs expected
Lisa Watson + Ann Hugh3645% games−2.6% vs expected
Mary Thompson + Ann Hugh152048% games−3.5% vs expected
Lisa Watson + Sally Panis1442% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Karp
70W–32L career · no lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Janice Bull
36W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Jeana Marks
64W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ann Hugh
61W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Lisa Watson
25W–44L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Thompson
33W–68L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Sally Panis
24W–50L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Melissa Owens
26W–53L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Gretchen Garrison
26W–65L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Gotto
41W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Pam Babb
0W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shirlee Lindgren
6W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.