Teams

MC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs LPTC SILVERWon 41
W#1 DoublesEllen Davis / Peggy Hofstra vs Susan Whatley / Gwen Riley6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKristin Harvey vs Jennifer Halboth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Catalano / Natalie Sanso vs Lauren Anderson / Hilary Murphy6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJaime Stokes vs Nancy Hiester6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Patricia Demers vs Kellie Bonthron / Maddie Bonthron6-1, 6-4
2021-05-27vs HIW REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Demers / Peggy Hofstra vs Laura Billups / Palmira Miner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAna Bland / Natalie Sanso vs Alexa Crane / Nora Alby4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Catalano / Kathleen Keating vs Mieke Scripps / Emily Lenich2-6, 1-6
2021-05-20vs NJ GOLDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanice Tanabe / Pamela Catalano vs Natasha Uecker / Alexis Klas1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Natalie Sanso vs Tracie Cordeiro / Rachel Price6-4, 6-4
2021-05-13vs BP GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Catalano / Michelle Workman vs Susan Gallo / Cayti Stein5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Natalie Sanso vs Katie Shaw / Katie Todd6-3, 7-5
2021-05-06vs LTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeborah Bautista vs Martha McNamara1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Natalie Sanso vs Christie Bibeau / Ellen Muller6-3, 6-4
2021-04-29vs RHCC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Patricia Demers vs Julia McVey / Valerie VanAlsburg2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Catalano / Michelle Workman vs Susan Weese / Audi Lundy6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Keating / Natalie Sanso vs Stephanie Joens / Margy Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-22vs MC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPatricia Demers vs Margaret Kuhn6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathleen Keating / Natalie Sanso vs Janet Marks / Amy Coddington6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings59 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA GREY703149214
2SSH GREY7031411210
3BTA ORANGE7029618267
4SSLT NAVY7026921256
5NJ BLACK6128718248
6MC RED6127821233
7SSLGT NAVY6126922225
8APR GREEN6126922261
9BM ORANGE6127824283
10CACM GREY61251025257
11NJ GREY61231232323
12GTC BLACK61211435321
13PRKR GOLD5123716208
14SSLT GREEN5123718200
15HRCA RED52221332290
16TTA RED52211435318
17KC GREEN52201536305
18BP ORANGE52181737298
19CM MAROON52191638308
20CR RED42181228273
21CACI RED42181230257
22RCC RED43171839320
23HW BLUE43191639322
24KC ORANGE43191639321
25GTC NAVY43191639338
26KC NAVY43171840326
27GLDN RED43161940300
28LTC GREEN43181742348
29HFII GREEN34191634276
30SKY SILVER34191635306
31GTC BLUE34181738319
32SSG BLUE34191638324
33SSH GREEN34122346348
34HRCA BLUE34142148341
35RRTC NAVY24121841305
36LTA RED25152041343
37KC GREY25161942313
38GAC GREY25152045335
39RHCC BLUE25161946352
40WC NAVY25142147363
41STAP BLUE25142147364
42KC BLUE25142148342
43HRCA BLACK25132249370
44EM RED25112452368
45BRMST MAROON25112453377
46CVTA BLUE25112454371
47LEBTC BLACK25102554367
48SSLT YELLOW25102558385
49SH BLUE1562448321
50MC GOLD16142146353
51BCC RED16112449351
52SKY MAROON16122349353
53KC SILVER16112451352
54WP ORANGE16112452365
55CVTA GREEN1692654362
56APR YELLOW1682759388
57CPV GREEN0652553334
58LTC RED0782757380
59NJ YELLOW0772858396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jaime Stokes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Deborah Bautista
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Peggy Hofstra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Patricia Demers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Ellen Davis
published 3.5
3.15
Roberta Barolat
published
3.09
Natalie Sanso
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Workman
published
3.07
Pamela Catalano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Ana Bland
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Janice Tanabe
published
Kathleen Keating
published
Kristin Harvey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Bautista + Michelle Workman11260% games+8.5% vs expected
Ana Bland + Deborah Bautista3447% games+4.1% vs expected
Ana Bland + Janice Tanabe5650% games+0.8% vs expected
Janice Tanabe + Pamela Catalano4552% games−0.6% vs expected
Peggy Hofstra + Michelle Workman4546% games−2.9% vs expected
Ana Bland + Natalie Sanso12951% games−3.0% vs expected
Pamela Catalano + Patricia Demers4348% games−3.3% vs expected
Janice Tanabe + Michelle Workman3542% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Stokes
29W–24L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Bautista
70W–34L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
Peggy Hofstra
44W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Patricia Demers
94W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Ellen Davis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roberta Barolat
15W–16L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Natalie Sanso
50W–57L career · 7 lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
Michelle Workman
32W–52L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Pamela Catalano
66W–101L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ana Bland
87W–109L career · 5 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Janice Tanabe
18W–28L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Keating
10W–40L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Harvey
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.