Teams

MD.Jennings

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-18vs TOC.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Owen McGrew vs Andrew Perdue / Tom Letecheur6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-27vs TOC.ByrdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Owen McGrew vs Jermaine Byrd / Andrew Perdue6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Andres Carro0-6, 0-6
2024-04-20vs TOC.HullWon 10
W#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Owen McGrew vs Connor Wilkins / William Gray6-4, 6-2
2024-04-06vs TOC.ByrdLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Owen McGrew vs Peter Hull / Julien de la Mettrie7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Chris Crumpler vs Justin Panepinto / Paul Wachter4-6, 3-6
2024-03-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Charlie Ghriskey3-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs TOC.HullWon 10
W#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Owen McGrew vs Connor Wilkins / Charlie Ghriskey6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Grant McGrew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
David Marquina
published 5
4.45
Owen McGrew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Nick Brittis
published
4.28
Vance Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.22
Chris Crumpler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Jerfi Cicin
published
Jeffrey Schroeder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grant McGrew + Owen McGrew15560% games+3.8% vs expected
Vance Jennings + Chris Crumpler101351% games−5.5% vs expected
Vance Jennings + Grant McGrew4645% gamesnot enough data
Grant McGrew + Chris Crumpler4455% gamesnot enough data
Vance Jennings + Owen McGrew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Grant McGrew
92W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.78
5
David Marquina
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.69
4.5
Owen McGrew
87W–34L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
Nick Brittis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Chris Crumpler
62W–100L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
4.22
Jerfi Cicin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jeffrey Schroeder
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.