Teams

TOC.Byrd

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Julien de la Mettrie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-27vs MD.JenningsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Andrew Perdue vs Grant McGrew / Owen McGrew2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAndres Carro vs Aneesh Kodali6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Justin Panepinto vs Vance Jennings / Jeffrey Schroeder6-4, 6-3
2024-04-13vs TOC.HullWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Peter Hull vs Ryan Bernthal / Jonathan Hodges6-4, 6-2
2024-04-06vs MD.JenningsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Hull / Julien de la Mettrie vs Grant McGrew / Owen McGrew5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Panepinto / Paul Wachter vs Aneesh Kodali / Chris Crumpler6-4, 6-3
2024-04-02vs TOC.HullWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Kyle Zhou vs Kevin Huang / David Chermak6-3, 7-6
2024-03-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Panepinto / Andres Carro vs Jeffrey Smith / Andrew Ligay6-1, 6-1
2024-02-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesAndres Carro vs William Gray6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Andres Carro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.86
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
Justin Panepinto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.64
Loic Didavi
published
4.55
Paul Wachter
published
4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Kyle Zhou
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Carro + Julien de la Mettrie8265% games+4.3% vs expected
Andres Carro + Justin Panepinto5359% gamesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Julien de la Mettrie4181% gamesnot enough data
Justin Panepinto + Julien de la Mettrie224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andres Carro
90W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.86
5
Justin Panepinto
46W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Loic Didavi
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.64
Paul Wachter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Kyle Zhou
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.