Teams

Serving Love

2022 DC WTA Adult 40 & Over Winter · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs 40 LOVELost 02
L#1 DoublesLucrecia Ledesma / Alice Ling vs Jennifer Eveges / Leah Noonan1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Helen Shepherd1-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs Bad News BearsWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Bosch / Danette Williams vs Simone Feldman / Marie Taylor5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Young vs Blair Reid6-2, 5-4
W#2 DoublesAlice Ling / Kim Miller vs Greta Davies / Agnes Trice6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-05vs 40 LOVELost 12
L#1 DoublesLucrecia Ledesma / Alice Ling vs Jennifer Eveges / Natalie Eatedali1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Kristin Quackenbush6-4, 1-2
L#2 DoublesBrenda Bosch / Lindsey Young vs Sharon Tompkins / Lori Brathwaite1-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs Bad News BearsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlice Ling / Darlene Queen vs Angie Wong / Blair Reid4-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Amy Hafey6-7
L#2 DoublesKay Bransford / Gail Douglass vs Marie Taylor / Kimberly Mielcarek5-7, 1-5
2022-02-13vs 40 LOVELost 02
L#1 DoublesCJ Lin / Alice Ling vs Jennifer Eveges / Leah Noonan0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKay Bransford / Danette Williams vs Helen Shepherd / Michele Krisanda2-6, 0-6
2022-02-12vs Bad News BearsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlice Ling / Kim Miller vs Marie Taylor / Dana MacHer6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCJ Lin vs Angie Wong2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDarlene Queen / Lucrecia Ledesma vs Greta Davies / Blair Reid6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-29vs 40 LOVELost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Douglass / Lindsey Young vs Leah Noonan / Malini Sekhar1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCJ Lin vs Elissa Lei6-4, 3-4
L#2 DoublesKay Bransford / Brenda Bosch vs Yolanda Alexander / Natalie Eatedali4-6, 2-6
2022-01-22vs Bad News BearsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrenda Bosch / Gail Douglass vs Dana MacHer / Simone Feldman1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCJ Lin vs Amy Hafey6-3, 5-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Mathys / Jemine Bryon vs Ami Chastain / Kerrie Jenkins4-6, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

CJ Lin
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Alice Ling
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.93
Lucrecia Ledesma
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Jemine Bryon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.90
Kim Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Darlene Queen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Danette Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Cindy Mathys
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Pilar Falo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Brenda Bosch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Gail Douglass
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Kerry Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Young
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Bransford + Pilar Falo7553% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CJ Lin
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Alice Ling
71W–73L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Lucrecia Ledesma
16W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.93
Jemine Bryon
56W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Darlene Queen
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Danette Williams
41W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cindy Mathys
98W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Pilar Falo
91W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Brenda Bosch
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Gail Douglass
117W–174L career · 7 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kerry Murray
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Young
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.