Teams

40 LOVE

2022 DC WTA Adult 40 & Over Winter · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.57 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-27vs Bad News BearsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Michele Krisanda vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Marie Taylor6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElissa Lei vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErika Trost / Malini Sekhar vs Agnes Trice / Greta Davies6-1, 6-0
2022-03-26vs Serving LoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eveges / Leah Noonan vs Lucrecia Ledesma / Alice Ling6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHelen Shepherd vs Cindy Mathys6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYolanda Alexander / Michele Krisanda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-12vs Bad News BearsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Helen Shepherd vs Greta Davies / Caitlin Levanson6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDava Baumann vs Kerrie Jenkins3-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesSharon Tompkins / Elissa Lei vs Amy Hafey / Ami Chastain4-6, 5-7
2022-03-05vs Serving LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eveges / Natalie Eatedali vs Lucrecia Ledesma / Alice Ling6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Tompkins / Lori Brathwaite vs Brenda Bosch / Lindsey Young6-1, 6-3
2022-02-19vs Bad News BearsWon 20
W#1 DoublesErika Trost / Dava Baumann vs Simone Feldman / Agnes Trice6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Brathwaite / Yolanda Alexander vs Amy Hafey / Ami Chastain6-1, 6-4
2022-02-13vs Serving LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eveges / Leah Noonan vs CJ Lin / Alice Ling6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHelen Shepherd / Michele Krisanda vs Kay Bransford / Danette Williams6-2, 6-0
2022-02-05vs Bad News BearsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDava Baumann / Natalie Eatedali vs Caitlin Levanson / Eleanor Tydings Gollob6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHelen Shepherd vs Kerrie Jenkins6-4, 5-6
W#2 DoublesLori Brathwaite / Erika Trost vs Simone Feldman / Agnes Trice6-0, 6-3
2022-01-29vs Serving LoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Noonan / Malini Sekhar vs Gail Douglass / Lindsey Young6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesElissa Lei vs CJ Lin4-6, 4-3
W#2 DoublesYolanda Alexander / Natalie Eatedali vs Kay Bransford / Brenda Bosch6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Erika Trost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Leah Noonan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Natalie Eatedali
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Malini Sekhar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Dava Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Helen Shepherd
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Michele Krisanda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Elissa Lei
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Dao Phan-Vissering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
Yolanda Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Quackenbush
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lori Brathwaite
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Eatedali + Leah Noonan3355% games+5.9% vs expected
Malini Sekhar + Erika Trost5260% games+5.7% vs expected
Michele Krisanda + Erika Trost314 matchesnot enough data
Malini Sekhar + Leah Noonan314 matchesnot enough data
Michele Krisanda + Helen Shepherd303 matchesnot enough data
Malini Sekhar + Natalie Eatedali303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erika Trost
383W–194L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.58
Leah Noonan
50W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Natalie Eatedali
125W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Malini Sekhar
177W–94L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Dava Baumann
33W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Helen Shepherd
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
Michele Krisanda
145W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Elissa Lei
136W–205L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Dao Phan-Vissering
232W–272L career · 2 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Yolanda Alexander
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Brathwaite
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.