Teams

Love All

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.68 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs PTSA 18+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Roby / Danielle Lofgren vs Terry Hardy / Caitlin Zimmerman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Laws vs MIRIAM MUNTEAN4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMadeline Beyer / Andrea Baerwald vs Ui Afualo / Lisa Diehr4-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Slice Girls 18+Won 21
W#1 SinglesKatie Laws vs Stacia Albiston6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristeena Sevy / Jo Roby vs Jacqueline Hickman / Lisa della Badia5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Small / Madeline Beyer vs Lori Ewing / Cassie Ewing5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-10vs Net ResultsLost 02
L#2 DoublesDanielle Stoddard / Danielle Lofgren vs Karlie Braseth / Dawn Coder2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Emily Flores4-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs TerminettersWon 31
W#1 DoublesDanielle Lofgren / Daniela Hefner vs Kelly Sturdy / Karen East2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Laws vs Jeanna Rice6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristeena Sevy / Jo Roby vs Molly Henrie / Carlee Seaney6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Stoddard / Ada Hansen vs Angie O'Hara / Kristen Kasney6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs Shot Show 18sSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Rebecca Kochvar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Stoddard / Jo Roby vs Lauren Noonan / Molly Otter3-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs NetChix 18Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniela Hefner / Jo Roby vs Courtney Hobbs / Kimberly Cowley7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Laws vs Christina Floyd6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKylie Nesbit / Madeline Beyer vs Mary Burke / Monica Reagan6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Lofgren / Danielle Stoddard vs Jessika Hulewsky / Mandy Bergstrom3-6, 4-6
2026-05-27vs OverServed18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesMadeline Beyer / Andrea Baerwald vs Teresa Comiskey / Lisa Kasney6-1, 6-3
2026-05-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Laws vs Adrienne Idsal4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ada Hansen
published 4
3.74
Daniela Hefner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Chelsey Melby
published 4
3.62
Danielle Lofgren
published 4
3.56
Kylie Nesbit
published 3.5
3.55
Adair Holden
published 3.5
3.50
Allison Young
published 3.5
3.45
Christeena Sevy
published 3.5
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.28
Jean Nielsen
published 3.5
3.25
Andrea Baerwald
published 3.5
3.12
Danielle Stoddard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Small
published 3.5
3.00
Jo Roby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Katie Laws
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Madeline Beyer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kylie Nesbit + Christeena Sevy4170% games+18.2% vs expected
Allison Young + Christeena Sevy4255% games+6.8% vs expected
Kylie Nesbit + Adair Holden4259% games+6.7% vs expected
Jennifer Mitchell + Jane Perlaky243647% games+1.6% vs expected
Daniela Hefner + Danielle Lofgren6848% games+1.4% vs expected
Andrea Baerwald + Adair Holden5558% games+0.4% vs expected
Danielle Stoddard + Danielle Lofgren2639% games−2.1% vs expected
Ada Hansen + Madeline Beyer6258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ada Hansen
252W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Daniela Hefner
63W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Chelsey Melby
140W–63L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Danielle Lofgren
33W–58L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Kylie Nesbit
58W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Adair Holden
127W–71L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Allison Young
39W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Christeena Sevy
101W–95L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Jane Perlaky
146W–185L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Jean Nielsen
48W–29L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Andrea Baerwald
61W–88L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danielle Stoddard
83W–139L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jennifer Small
244W–196L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Jo Roby
63W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Laws
38W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Madeline Beyer
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.