Teams

Net Results

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.91 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-24vs NetChix 18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAvery Schwanz vs Courtney Hobbs4-6, 3-6
2026-06-22Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAvery Schwanz vs Liz Given5-7, 2-6
2026-06-10vs Love AllLost 01
L#1 SinglesAvery Schwanz vs Ada Hansen2-6, 6-7
2026-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesAvery Schwanz vs Rachel Boren6-0, 6-0
2026-05-29Won 10
W#2 SinglesAvery Schwanz vs Andi Trued6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Heather Baird
published 4
3.95
Mary Katayama
published 4
3.91
Emily Flores
published 4
3.85
Kelly Wedeven
published 4
3.85
Dawn Coder
published 4
3.83
3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.75
Tara Wolf
published 4
Emily Smith
published 4
3.74
Karlie Braseth
published 4
3.68
Courtney Sticka
published 4
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.64
Lexi Bruneel
published 4
3.62
Emery Baker
published 3.5
3.52
Avery Schwanz
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Vanessa Schulte
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Flores + Tara Wolf4261% games+18.0% vs expected
Paula Lawson + Emery Baker5068% games+17.3% vs expected
Paula Lawson + Lisa Trujillo-Dunn10655% games+9.9% vs expected
Courtney Sticka + Lisa Trujillo-Dunn5256% games+5.2% vs expected
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn + Tara Wolf17960% games+3.1% vs expected
Emily Flores + Heather Baird10166% games+0.8% vs expected
Kelly Wedeven + Heather Baird3248% games−6.3% vs expected
Paula Lawson + Tara Wolf8453% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Baird
168W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Mary Katayama
82W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Emily Flores
157W–100L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Kelly Wedeven
127W–116L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Dawn Coder
91W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn
188W–132L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Tara Wolf
74W–61L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Emily Smith
22W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Karlie Braseth
59W–49L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Courtney Sticka
90W–76L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Lexi Bruneel
26W–31L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Emery Baker
32W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Avery Schwanz
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Vanessa Schulte
107W–97L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.