Teams

LCTA55/Zwerner/LTP-DI

2022 USTA 55 & Over Spring · Women-4.0 - Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-04-02vs LCTA55/Magnuson/MPRWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Frain / Carolyne Hale vs Susy Teale / Beth Green6-1, 6-4
2022-03-05vs LCTA55/Barwick/Doty ParkWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Brechtel / Amy Frain vs Elizabeth Holt / Denise McEwan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-19vs LCTA55/Magnuson/MPRWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Frain / Lisa Brechtel vs Beth Green / Jeri Drouillard6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women-4.0 - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Leah Biller
published
3.75
Ann Shimer
published 4
3.68
Charlene Pearman
published 4
3.68
3.67
Sarah Dacosta
published
3.66
Amy Frain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Ruth Ennis
published
3.61
3.45
Nan Mettam
published
Linda Costello
published
Lisa Brechtel
published
Lisa Disher
published
Nancy Shannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlene Pearman + Barbara Pinkerton9651% games−7.5% vs expected
Sarah Dacosta + Linda Costello5250% games−7.5% vs expected
Lisa Disher + Leah Biller303 matchesnot enough data
Julie Rhomberg-Miller + Linda Costello123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Biller
27W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ann Shimer
34W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Charlene Pearman
33W–19L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Julie Rhomberg-Miller
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Sarah Dacosta
52W–29L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Amy Frain
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Ruth Ennis
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Barbara Pinkerton
44W–31L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Nan Mettam
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Linda Costello
48W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Brechtel
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Disher
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Shannon
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.