Teams

LCTA55/Magnuson/MPR

2022 USTA 55 & Over Spring · Women-4.0 - Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women-4.0 - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
3.60
Teresa McKellar
published
3.52
Susy Teale
published
3.49
Ann OBrien
published 4
3.44
Deborah McFann
published 3.5
3.43
Jane Fitzsimmons
published
3.38
Helen Elliott
published 3.5
3.26
Suzie Smith
published
3.25
Christiane Jones
published 3.5
Beth Green
published 3.5
3.13
Juliet Still
published
3.10
Natalie Garrett
published
3.02
Susan McCormick
published
2.92
Danher Wang
published 3
Jeri Drouillard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzie Smith + Juliet Still2348% games+11.7% vs expected
Danher Wang + Christiane Jones5257% games+8.3% vs expected
Suzie Smith + Christiane Jones0838% games−2.7% vs expected
Susy Teale + Ann OBrien1641% games−4.8% vs expected
Teresa McKellar + Juliet Still1541% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Smith + Jane Fitzsimmons044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Fitzsimmons + Christiane Jones044 matchesnot enough data
Ann OBrien + Helen Elliott134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlene Magnuson
60W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Teresa McKellar
32W–45L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
Susy Teale
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Ann OBrien
7W–29L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Deborah McFann
101W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jane Fitzsimmons
22W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Helen Elliott
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Suzie Smith
79W–147L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Christiane Jones
97W–139L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Beth Green
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juliet Still
22W–29L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Natalie Garrett
39W–88L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Susan McCormick
20W–31L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Danher Wang
62W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jeri Drouillard
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.