Teams

Terrell Mill (Kumi Rizvi)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.0 Men

19 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs Terrell Mill (Jeffrey Elrod)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesJacob Fagin / Thomas Leslie vs Reniel Kaldani / Jeffrey Elrod6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEron Tunstall vs Yeonkuk Woo5-7, 6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hamby / David Arbelaez vs Sachith de Silva / Benjamin Bricker6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTarun Shanker vs Graeson Maddox7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMark Ellgass / Andrew Cortner vs Michael Smith / Niles Berthen4-6, 6-1, 1-6
2025-07-06vs Glenlake TC (Daniel Bautisa)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesTarun Shanker / Thomas Leslie vs Matthew Chamblin / Maurice Sanders2-6, 6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChris Antley vs Beri Maimo1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNyles Peterson / Sayem Hoque vs Daniel Bautista / Shichao Tang7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKumi Rizvi vs Tarrance Malone1-6, 7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaul Spann / Samuel Russell vs Gregory Larchev / Jerry Noyola1-6, 0-6
2025-06-29vs Piedmont Park (Steve Kiehl)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesAlex Cipcic / Bill Painter vs Felix Camacho / Michael Mizerak6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEron Tunstall vs Alex Rice6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKumi Rizvi / John Winkler vs Benji Goldman / Peter James6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChris Antley vs Stephen Kiehl7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSayem Hoque / Mark Ellgass vs Heath Allen / Jacob Head3-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs Dekalb TC (Andrew Turner)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesAlex Cipcic / Matthew Hamby vs Nicholas Gaffga / Christopher Martin6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Winkler vs Jaheem Joseph6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChris Antley / Reid Winkler vs Terrence Wise / Noah Woodruff6-3, 3-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNyles Peterson vs Jace Whitsey6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShaarif Sajid / Andrew Cortner vs Adam Bressler / Tim Lampe4-6, 3-6
2025-06-15vs Glenlake II (Jean-Marc Lawrence)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesJohn Winkler / Alex Cipcic vs Jean-Marc Lawrence / Darrell Mercer6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEron Tunstall vs Raphael Kim4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBill Painter / Joe Overman vs Andrew Jin / Matthew Sines3-6, 6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTarun Shanker vs Lou Gallardo6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Antley / Shaarif Sajid vs Richard Damaska / Moo Sirikittisup6-3, 6-0
2025-06-01vs Terrell Mill (Walter Brill)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesReid Winkler / Matthew Hamby vs Jeff Olson / Michael Smith6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Winkler vs Nripraj Kunwar6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJacob Fagin / Kumi Rizvi vs Daniel Burnett / Steve Byrne6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSamuel Russell vs L Hill Griffin6-3, 1-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Spann / David Arbelaez vs Daniel Infante / Scott St Lifer2-6, 6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Men
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
John Winkler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Matthew Hamby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Joe Overman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Reid Winkler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Tarun Shanker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Chris Antley
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Alex Cipcic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Kumi Rizvi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Eron Tunstall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Thomas Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Nyles Peterson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Shaarif Sajid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Andrew Cortner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Samuel Russell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
David Arbelaez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jacob Fagin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Ellgass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Spann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sayem Hoque
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Winkler
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Matthew Hamby
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Joe Overman
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Reid Winkler
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Tarun Shanker
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Chris Antley
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Alex Cipcic
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kumi Rizvi
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Eron Tunstall
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Thomas Leslie
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
Nyles Peterson
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Shaarif Sajid
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Andrew Cortner
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Samuel Russell
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
David Arbelaez
4W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Jacob Fagin
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Ellgass
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Spann
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sayem Hoque
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.