Teams

East Roswell Park (Joshua Seider)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesSteven McQueen / Brett Handelman vs Vamsi Reddy / Sailesh Makhijani2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDeepak Karerakattil vs Julian Munoz0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Jo / Yong Jo vs Mitch Mann / Michael Blalock6-2, 4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Seider vs Amit Narayan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Feldman / Chinu Ehani vs Jonathan Dittmar / John Hackney2-6, 6-7
2025-07-06vs Oxford Mill (Will Byington)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesJeremy Rawn / Matthew Omerza vs James Kwon / Christian Hernandez6-4, 2-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYulong Liang vs Manish Mehta6-4, 3-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Miranda / Brett Handelman vs Brian Nichols / Will Byington7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesRichard Jo vs Russell Holloway6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeepak Karerakattil / Josh Edwards vs Craig Savage / Marianno Smith2-6, 3-6
2025-06-29vs Jones Bridge (Bud Harris)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Jo / Yong Jo vs Nicholas Rose / Bud Harris6-7, 3-6, 0-0
L#1 SinglesYulong Liang vs Brian Kues3-6, 2-6, 0-0
L#2 DoublesBrett Handelman / Joshua Seider vs Alex Ivchenko / Ashish Nebhani4-6, 2-6, 0-0
2025-06-22vs Montclair (Asifuddin Khadari)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesJeremy Rawn / Chinu Ehani vs Mohammed Awaiz / Nirav Patel1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesYulong Liang vs Pete Dao6-4, 3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYong Jo / Brian Feldman vs Khaled Mohamed / MJ Mohammed1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJoshua Seider vs Dev Shah1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Edwards / Steven McQueen vs Afzal Quadri / Shaan Noorani2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMatthew Omerza / Jeremy Rawn vs Prabhakaran Karunanithi / Senthil Narayanan6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDeepak Karerakattil vs Shanmugam SenthurArasu1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrett Handelman / Brian Feldman vs Karthikeyan Kathirkamanathan / DHINESH KUMAR RENGANATHAN1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChris Miranda vs Karthikeyan Raju0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoshua Seider / Josh Edwards vs Balamurugan Natarajan / Raguraman Murugesan0-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs Fields Club (Kevin Brown)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesJosh Edwards / Yong Jo vs Ben Lester / Sean McCullough0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesYulong Liang vs HanSoo Kim6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrett Handelman / Jeremy Rawn vs Kevin Brown / Michael Gricus6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesChinu Ehani vs Chandler White2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven McQueen / Chris Miranda vs Robert Lammers / Baxter Crane4-6, 6-4, 2-6
2025-06-01vs USTA Atlanta/Brian ClarkLost 14
L#1 DoublesChinu Ehani / Yulong Liang vs Jack Clark / Charles Lassiat1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJeremy Rawn vs Pat Mcdonald0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrett Handelman / Yong Jo vs Andrew Ford / Matt Kinderman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Jo vs Franklin Wu7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteven McQueen / Timothy Wang vs Brian Clark / Mark Erickson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Men
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Matthew Omerza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Richard Jo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Jeremy Rawn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Brett Handelman
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.66
Chris Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Yong Jo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.61
Steven McQueen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Brian Feldman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Yulong Liang
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.42
Joshua Seider
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Josh Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.15
Chinu Ehani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.15
Deepak Karerakattil
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Timothy Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Omerza
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Richard Jo
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Jeremy Rawn
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brett Handelman
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Chris Miranda
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
Yong Jo
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Steven McQueen
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Brian Feldman
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Yulong Liang
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Joshua Seider
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Josh Edwards
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Chinu Ehani
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Deepak Karerakattil
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Timothy Wang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.