Teams

BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.21 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-29vs BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaportWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Rudy / Lisa Drexinger vs Elizabeth Lujambio / Tricia Rapaport3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-14vs BC-LLW-MCC/SarahSautotWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Drexinger / Christie Edman vs Ali Swerz / Molly Wright6-3, 6-4
2023-09-09vs BC-MCC/AmySchmargenWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnne DeMartini / Lisa Drexinger vs Lora Penczar / Kari Carpino7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Stephanie Rudy
published
3.36
Kristen Roath
published
3.28
Shannon Nicholson
published
3.27
Susan Warner
published
Angela Nelson
published 3.5
3.21
Mari Bellas
published
3.19
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.17
Maricel Rocha
published
3.06
Joy Huffman
published 3.5
2.94
Joi Gillam
published
2.86
Lisa Drexinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Anne DeMartini
published 3
Evelyn Borgatta
published 3
2.70
Diane Saunders
published 3
Joyce Nikolic
published
Linda Cronkite
published
Tess Hechmer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rudy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Kristen Roath
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Shannon Nicholson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Angela Nelson
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Maricel Rocha
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Joy Huffman
39W–41L career · type A · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Joi Gillam
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Lisa Drexinger
122W–173L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Evelyn Borgatta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Diane Saunders
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Joyce Nikolic
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Cronkite
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tess Hechmer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.